These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11635095)
41. "I know something awful is going to happen": abortion in early twentieth century Alabama. Cvornyek RL; Cvornyek DL South Stud; 1985; 24(2):229-32. PubMed ID: 11618160 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. [Not Available]. Dupâquier J; Lachiver M Ann Econ Soc Civilis; 1981; 36(3):489-92. PubMed ID: 11631507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Abortion in France: women and the regulation of family size 1800-1914. McLaren A Fr Hist Stud; 1978; 10(3):461-85. PubMed ID: 11614490 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. A memorable trial in seventeenth-century Maryland. Rose L Md Hist Mag; 1988; 83(4):365-8. PubMed ID: 11617670 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. The early years of the Rhode Island Birth Control League. Nicoll CE; Weisbord RG R I Hist; 1986; 45(4):111-25. PubMed ID: 11618008 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. The female animal: medical and biological views of woman and her role in nineteenth century America. Smith-Rosenberg C; Rosenberg C J Am Hist; 1973; 60():332-56. PubMed ID: 11614683 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. The Ortho Museum on the history of contraception. Stieb EW Pharm Hist; 1989; 31(4):182-3. PubMed ID: 11622039 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. The origins of the birth control movement in England in the early nineteenth century. Langer WL J Interdiscip Hist; 1975; 5(4):669-86. PubMed ID: 11619426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. The evolution of family planning in Australia. Caldwell JC; Ware H Popul Stud (Camb); 1973 Mar; 27(1):7-31. PubMed ID: 11630535 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Who is frightened of reproductive freedom for women and why? Some historical answers. Gordon L Frontiers (Boulder); 1986; 9(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 11616991 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Further notes on the history of infanticide. Langer WL Hist Child Q; 1974; 2(1):129-34. PubMed ID: 11614540 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. The condom in modern and postmodern culture. Trumbach R J Hist Sex; 1991 Jul; 2(1):95-8. PubMed ID: 11622919 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Thirty years of family planning in India. Ledbetter R Asian Surv; 1984; 24(7):736-58. PubMed ID: 11616645 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Decrease and stultify: contraception and abortion in American society. Kennedy DM Rev Am Hist; 1979; 7(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 11610795 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Infanticide, illegitimacy and the medical profession in nineteenth century England. Clarke K Soc Soc Hist Med Bull (Lond); 1980 Jun; 26():11-14. PubMed ID: 11610799 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. [Not Available]. Pecker A Rev Hist Med Heb; 1971 Jun; 24():55-8. PubMed ID: 11626536 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Family planning in Louisiana. Guillory F New South; 1971; 26(4):29-34. PubMed ID: 11632596 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Coercion in a soft state: the family planning program of India. Vicziany M Pac Aff; 1982; 55(3):557-92. PubMed ID: 11632654 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. A brief note on rubber technology and contraception: the diaphragm and the condom. Bullough VL Technol Cult; 1981; 22(1):104-11. PubMed ID: 11610847 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]