114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11639422)
1. The triumph of the pre-embryo: interpretations of the human embryo in Parliamentary debate over embryo research.
Mulkay M
Soc Stud Sci; 1994 Nov; 24(4):611-39. PubMed ID: 11639422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Parliamentary cultures and human embryos: the Dutch and British debates compared.
Kirejczyk M
Soc Stud Sci; 1999 Dec; 29(6):889-912. PubMed ID: 11624111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990 -- a British case history for legislation on bioethical issues.
Bolton V; Osborn J; Servante D
J Int Bioethique; 1992 Jun; 3(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 11651386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The start of a long debate on the Warnock report.
Deitch R
Lancet; 1984 Jul; 2(8396):238. PubMed ID: 11644288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Galileo and the embryos: religion and science in parliamentary debate over research on human embryos.
Mulkay M
Soc Stud Sci; 1995 Aug; 25(3):499-532. PubMed ID: 11645893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Embryo and stem cell research in the USA: a political history.
Wertz DC
Trends Mol Med; 2002 Mar; 8(3):143-6. PubMed ID: 11879776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Deciding about embryo research.
Nature; 1989 Nov; 342(6249):461-2. PubMed ID: 2586616
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Commons debates Warnock report.
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1984 Dec; 289(6458):1639. PubMed ID: 11652438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Parliament gives overwhelming approval to embryo research.
Coghlan A
New Sci; 1990 Apr; 126(1714):29. PubMed ID: 11655969
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Reproductive technology: in Britain, the debate after the Warnock Report.
Gillon R
Hastings Cent Rep; 1987 Jun; 17(3):S16-8. PubMed ID: 11644023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The preembryo's short lifetime. The history of a word.
Ferrer Colomer M; Pastor LM
Cuad Bioet; 2012; 23(79):677-94. PubMed ID: 23320640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Brave new world.
Lancet; 1985 Mar; 1(8427):535. PubMed ID: 11644445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Changing minds about embryo research.
Mulkay M
Public Underst Sci; 1994; 3():195-213. PubMed ID: 11659865
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Council agrees response to Warnock report.
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1985 Jan; 290(6463):255-6. PubMed ID: 11658545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. ETHICS, EMBRYOS, AND EVIDENCE: A LOOK BACK AT WARNOCK.
Hammond-Browning N
Med Law Rev; 2015; 23(4):588-619. PubMed ID: 26232721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. IVF: regulation or prohibition?
McLaren A
Nature; 1989 Nov; 342(6249):469-70. PubMed ID: 2586619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Moral thinking and government policy: the Warnock Committee on Human Embryology.
Warnock M
Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc; 1985; 63(3):504-22. PubMed ID: 3852077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Recommendations of the Warnock Committee.
Lancet; 1984 Jul; 2(8396):217-8. PubMed ID: 6146766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pressure for a select committee on human embryo research and genetic engineering.
McKie D
Lancet; 1985 Nov; 2(8462):1021-2. PubMed ID: 11644451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Warnock report on human fertilisation and embryology.
Wells WT
Lancet; 1984 Sep; 2(8401):531-2. PubMed ID: 6147600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
