321 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11641161)
1. Fast three-point dixon MR imaging using low-resolution images for phase correction: a comparison with chemical shift selective fat suppression for pediatric musculoskeletal imaging.
Rybicki FJ; Chung T; Reid J; Jaramillo D; Mulkern RV; Ma J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Nov; 177(5):1019-23. PubMed ID: 11641161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. T2-weighted spine imaging with a fast three-point dixon technique: comparison with chemical shift selective fat suppression.
Ma J; Singh SK; Kumar AJ; Leeds NE; Zhan J
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Dec; 20(6):1025-9. PubMed ID: 15558561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the artifacts caused by metallic implants in breast MRI using dual-echo dixon versus conventional fat-suppression techniques.
Le Y; Kipfer HD; Majidi SS; Holz S; Lin C
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):W307-14. PubMed ID: 25148189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fat suppression at three-dimensional T1-weighted MR imaging of the hands: Dixon method versus CHESS technique.
Kirchgesner T; Perlepe V; Michoux N; Larbi A; Vande Berg B
Diagn Interv Imaging; 2018 Jan; 99(1):23-28. PubMed ID: 29054404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fast spin-echo triple-echo Dixon: initial clinical experience with a novel pulse sequence for fat-suppressed T2-weighted abdominal MR imaging.
Low RN; Ma J; Panchal N
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Sep; 30(3):569-77. PubMed ID: 19711403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparing T1-weighted and T2-weighted three-point Dixon technique with conventional T1-weighted fat-saturation and short-tau inversion recovery (STIR) techniques for the study of the lumbar spine in a short-bore MRI machine.
Brandão S; Seixas D; Ayres-Basto M; Castro S; Neto J; Martins C; Ferreira JC; Parada F
Clin Radiol; 2013 Nov; 68(11):e617-23. PubMed ID: 23932678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. T1-weighted 3D dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast using a dual-echo Dixon technique at 3 T.
Dogan BE; Ma J; Hwang K; Liu P; Yang WT
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2011 Oct; 34(4):842-51. PubMed ID: 21769987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. T1-weighted fat-suppressed imaging of the pelvis with a dual-echo Dixon technique: initial clinical experience.
Beddy P; Rangarajan RD; Kataoka M; Moyle P; Graves MJ; Sala E
Radiology; 2011 Feb; 258(2):583-9. PubMed ID: 21079201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fat suppression with short inversion time inversion-recovery and chemical-shift selective saturation: a dual STIR-CHESS combination prepulse for turbo spin echo pulse sequences.
Tanabe K; Nishikawa K; Sano T; Sakai O; Jara H
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 May; 31(5):1277-81. PubMed ID: 20432368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Water excitation as an alternative to fat saturation in MR imaging: preliminary results in musculoskeletal imaging.
Hauger O; Dumont E; Chateil JF; Moinard M; Diard F
Radiology; 2002 Sep; 224(3):657-63. PubMed ID: 12202695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multiecho time-resolved acquisition (META): a high spatiotemporal resolution Dixon imaging sequence for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.
Saranathan M; Rettmann D; Bayram E; Lee C; Glockner J
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Jun; 29(6):1406-13. PubMed ID: 19425056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fat suppression at 2D MR imaging of the hands: Dixon method versus CHESS technique and STIR sequence.
Kirchgesner T; Perlepe V; Michoux N; Larbi A; Vande Berg B
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Apr; 89():40-46. PubMed ID: 28267547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Fast spin echo imaging of vertebral metastasis: comparison of fat suppression techniques (FSE-CHESS, STIR-FSE)].
Scarabino T; Giannatempo GM; Popolizio T; Scarale MG; Cammisa M; Salvolini U
Radiol Med; 1996 Sep; 92(3):180-5. PubMed ID: 8975299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled imaging of the liver: pulse sequence optimization and comparison with spin-echo MR imaging.
Low RN; Francis IR; Herfkens RJ; Jeffrey RB; Glazer GM; Foo TK; Shimakawa A; Pelc NJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Mar; 160(3):501-9. PubMed ID: 8381572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Development and evaluation of TWIST Dixon for dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI with improved acquisition efficiency and fat suppression.
Le Y; Kroeker R; Kipfer HD; Lin C
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Aug; 36(2):483-91. PubMed ID: 22544731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Keyhole Dixon method for faster, perceptually equivalent fat suppression.
Flask CA; Salem KA; Moriguchi H; Lewin JS; Wilson DL; Duerk JL
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2003 Jul; 18(1):103-12. PubMed ID: 12815645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Phase unwrapping in the three-point Dixon method for fat suppression MR imaging.
Szumowski J; Coshow WR; Li F; Quinn SF
Radiology; 1994 Aug; 192(2):555-61. PubMed ID: 8029431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of 3D two-point Dixon and standard 2D dual-echo breath-hold sequences for detection and quantification of fat content in renal angiomyolipoma.
Rosenkrantz AB; Raj S; Babb JS; Chandarana H
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jan; 81(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 21126839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Combined chemical-shift and phase-selective imaging for fat suppression: theory and initial clinical experience.
Chan TW; Listerud J; Kressel HY
Radiology; 1991 Oct; 181(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 1887054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Using a phantom to compare MR techniques for determining the ratio of intraabdominal to subcutaneous adipose tissue.
Donnelly LF; O'Brien KJ; Dardzinski BJ; Poe SA; Bean JA; Holland SK; Daniels SR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Apr; 180(4):993-8. PubMed ID: 12646443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
