These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

374 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11641195)

  • 1. Negative predictive value of sonography with mammography in patients with palpable breast lesions.
    Soo MS; Rosen EL; Baker JA; Vo TT; Boyd BA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Nov; 177(5):1167-70. PubMed ID: 11641195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Negative predictive value of sonography and mammography in patients with focal breast pain.
    Tumyan L; Hoyt AC; Bassett LW
    Breast J; 2005; 11(5):333-7. PubMed ID: 16174154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Invasive lobular carcinoma: detection with mammography, sonography, MRI, and breast-specific gamma imaging.
    Brem RF; Ioffe M; Rapelyea JA; Yost KG; Weigert JM; Bertrand ML; Stern LH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Feb; 192(2):379-83. PubMed ID: 19155397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Short-term follow-up of palpable breast lesions with benign imaging features: evaluation of 375 lesions in 320 women.
    Harvey JA; Nicholson BT; Lorusso AP; Cohen MA; Bovbjerg VE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Dec; 193(6):1723-30. PubMed ID: 19933671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prospective evaluation of the value of combined mammographic and sonographic assessment in patients with palpable abnormalities of the breast.
    Shetty MK; Shah YP; Sharman RS
    J Ultrasound Med; 2003 Mar; 22(3):263-8; quiz 269-70. PubMed ID: 12636326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of diagnostic mammography and breast ultrasound during pregnancy and lactation.
    Robbins J; Jeffries D; Roubidoux M; Helvie M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Mar; 196(3):716-22. PubMed ID: 21343518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [The value of aspiration cytology within the scope of triple diagnosis of palpable breast changes].
    Schuhmann R; Hübner F; Brose C; Eckel S; Geier G; Kraus H; Schöndorf H; Schöndorf NK
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1995 Oct; 55(10):553-8. PubMed ID: 8543127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Occult breast lesion localization plus sentinel node biopsy (SNOLL): experience with 959 patients at the European Institute of Oncology.
    Monti S; Galimberti V; Trifiro G; De Cicco C; Peradze N; Brenelli F; Fernandez-Rodriguez J; Rotmensz N; Latronico A; Berrettini A; Mauri M; Machado L; Luini A; Paganelli G
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Oct; 14(10):2928-31. PubMed ID: 17674108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of predicting axillary lymph node positivity by physical examination, mammography, ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance imaging.
    Valente SA; Levine GM; Silverstein MJ; Rayhanabad JA; Weng-Grumley JG; Ji L; Holmes DR; Sposto R; Sener SF
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Jun; 19(6):1825-30. PubMed ID: 22227922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of clinical examination, digital mammogram, ultrasound, and MRI in determining postneoadjuvant pathologic tumor response in operable breast cancer patients.
    Croshaw R; Shapiro-Wright H; Svensson E; Erb K; Julian T
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Oct; 18(11):3160-3. PubMed ID: 21947594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sonographic, mammographic, and histopathologic correlation of symptomatic ductal carcinoma in situ.
    Yang WT; Tse GM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Jan; 182(1):101-10. PubMed ID: 14684521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical usefulness of MR imaging of the breast in the evaluation of the problematic mammogram.
    Lee CH; Smith RC; Levine JA; Troiano RN; Tocino I
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Nov; 173(5):1323-9. PubMed ID: 10541112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lobular neoplasia at 11-gauge vacuum-assisted stereotactic biopsy: correlation with surgical excisional biopsy and mammographic follow-up.
    Mahoney MC; Robinson-Smith TM; Shaughnessy EA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Oct; 187(4):949-54. PubMed ID: 16985141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Specificity of mammography and US in the evaluation of a palpable abnormality: retrospective review.
    Moy L; Slanetz PJ; Moore R; Satija S; Yeh ED; McCarthy KA; Hall D; Staffa M; Rafferty EA; Halpern E; Kopans DB
    Radiology; 2002 Oct; 225(1):176-81. PubMed ID: 12355002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mammography and ultrasound in the diagnosis of contralateral breast cancer.
    Rissanen TJ; Mäkäräinen HP; Apaja-Sarkkinen MA; Lindholm EL
    Acta Radiol; 1995 Jul; 36(4):358-66. PubMed ID: 7619612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pure lobular carcinoma of the breast presenting as a hyperechoic mass: incidence and imaging characteristics.
    Jones KN; Magut M; Henrichsen TL; Boughey JC; Reynolds C; Glazebrook KN
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Nov; 201(5):W765-9. PubMed ID: 24147507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Diagnostic difficulties in infiltrating lobular breast cancer: value of ultrasonography. 33 cases].
    Escolano E; Tournegros JM; Le Marc'Hadour F; Bernard P
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1997; 26(8):781-8. PubMed ID: 9509318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Follow-up of palpable circumscribed noncalcified solid breast masses at mammography and US: can biopsy be averted?
    Graf O; Helbich TH; Fuchsjaeger MH; Hopf G; Morgun M; Graf C; Mallek R; Sickles EA
    Radiology; 2004 Dec; 233(3):850-6. PubMed ID: 15486217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. MR imaging of the ipsilateral breast in women with percutaneously proven breast cancer.
    Liberman L; Morris EA; Dershaw DD; Abramson AF; Tan LK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Apr; 180(4):901-10. PubMed ID: 12646427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Paget's disease of the breast: accuracy of preoperative assessment.
    Zakaria S; Pantvaidya G; Ghosh K; Degnim AC
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Apr; 102(2):137-42. PubMed ID: 17028984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.