226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11641196)
1. CT angiography: in vitro comparison of five reconstruction methods.
Addis KA; Hopper KD; Iyriboz TA; Liu Y; Wise SW; Kasales CJ; Blebea JS; Mauger DT
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Nov; 177(5):1171-6. PubMed ID: 11641196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pancreaticoduodenal arcades and dorsal pancreatic artery: comparison of CT angiography with three-dimensional volume rendering, maximum intensity projection, and shaded-surface display.
Hong KC; Freeny PC
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Apr; 172(4):925-31. PubMed ID: 10587122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Measuring carotid artery stenosis using CT angiography: the dilemma of artifactual lumen eccentricity.
Wise SW; Hopper KD; Ten Have T; Schwartz T
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Apr; 170(4):919-23. PubMed ID: 9530034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of contrast densities in the diagnosis of carotid stenosis by CT angiography.
Claves JL; Wise SW; Hopper KD; Tully D; Ten Have TR; Weaver J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Aug; 169(2):569-73. PubMed ID: 9242779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. CT angiography with volume rendering for quantifying vascular stenoses: in vitro validation of accuracy.
Kuszyk BS; Heath DG; Johnson PT; Eng J; Fishman EK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Aug; 173(2):449-55. PubMed ID: 10430152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. CT angiography: basic principles and post-processing applications.
Salgado R; Mulkens T; Ozsarlak O; De Schepper AM; Parizel PA
JBR-BTR; 2003; 86(6):336-40. PubMed ID: 14748397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Semitransparent volume-rendering CT angiography for lesion display in aortoiliac arteriosclerotic disease.
Portugaller HR; Schoellnast H; Tauss J; Tiesenhausen K; Hausegger KA
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2003 Aug; 14(8):1023-30. PubMed ID: 12902560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Vascular diameter measurement in CT angiography: comparison of model-based iterative reconstruction and standard filtered back projection algorithms in vitro.
Suzuki S; Machida H; Tanaka I; Ueno E
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Mar; 200(3):652-7. PubMed ID: 23436858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic sensitivity of multidetector-row spiral computed tomography angiography in the evaluation of type-II endoleaks and their source: comparison between axial scans and reformatting techniques.
Saba L; Pascalis L; Montisci R; Sanfilippo R; Mallarini G
Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):630-7. PubMed ID: 18568554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Optimization of shaded surface display for CT angiography.
Addis KA; Hopper KD; Iyriboz TA; Kasales CJ; Liu Y; Wise SW
Acad Radiol; 2001 Oct; 8(10):976-81. PubMed ID: 11699850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. CT angiography for evaluation of living renal donors: comparison of four reconstruction methods.
Kim JK; Kim JH; Bae SJ; Cho KS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Aug; 183(2):471-7. PubMed ID: 15269043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Internal carotid arterial stenosis: CT angiography with volume rendering.
Leclerc X; Godefroy O; Lucas C; Benhaim JF; Michel TS; Leys D; Pruvo JP
Radiology; 1999 Mar; 210(3):673-82. PubMed ID: 10207466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Three-dimensional volume rendering of spiral CT data: theory and method.
Calhoun PS; Kuszyk BS; Heath DG; Carley JC; Fishman EK
Radiographics; 1999; 19(3):745-64. PubMed ID: 10336201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multidetector-row CT angiography diagnostic sensitivity in evaluation of renal artery stenosis: comparison between multiple reconstruction techniques.
Saba L; Caddeo G; Sanfilippo R; Montisci R; Mallarini G
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2007; 31(5):712-6. PubMed ID: 17895781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of automated CT angiography measurement of vascular diameter in phantoms: effect of size of display field of view, density of contrast medium, and wall thickness.
Suzuki S; Furui S; Kaminaga T
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Jun; 184(6):1940-4. PubMed ID: 15908558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [CT angiography in arterial occlusive disease: comparison of 3 rendering techniques].
Rieker O; Mildenberger P; Neufang A; von Zitzewitz H; Schweden F; Thelen M
Rofo; 1997 Oct; 167(4):361-70. PubMed ID: 9417264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy and precision of CT angiography in a model of carotid artery bifurcation stenosis.
Dix JE; Evans AJ; Kallmes DF; Sobel AH; Phillips CD
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1997 Mar; 18(3):409-15. PubMed ID: 9090395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [CT angiography hemodynamically relevant to renal artery stenosis. Evaluation of AXIAL, MPR, MIP and SSD reconstruction procedures under standard investigation conditions].
Wilhelm K; Wilsmann-Theis D; Sommer T; Leutner C; Textor J; Schild H
Rofo; 2000 Feb; 172(2):161-7. PubMed ID: 10723490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Spiral CT of renal artery stenosis: comparison of three-dimensional rendering techniques.
Rubin GD; Dake MD; Napel S; Jeffrey RB; McDonnell CH; Sommer FG; Wexler L; Williams DM
Radiology; 1994 Jan; 190(1):181-9. PubMed ID: 8259402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Helical CT angiography with multiplanar reformation: techniques and clinical applications.
Ibukuro K; Charnsangavej C; Chasen MH; Cinqualbre AB; Herron DH; Robinson TJ; Wallace S
Radiographics; 1995 May; 15(3):671-82. PubMed ID: 7624571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
