These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11641676)
1. Oral versus vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Fisher SA; Mackenzie VP; Davies GA Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Oct; 185(4):906-10. PubMed ID: 11641676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of various routes and dosages of misoprostol for cervical ripening and the induction of labor. How HY; Leaseburge L; Khoury JC; Siddiqi TA; Spinnato JA; Sibai BM Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Oct; 185(4):911-5. PubMed ID: 11641677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of oral and vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor at term: a randomized controlled trial. Paungmora N; Herabutya Y; O-Prasertsawat P; Punyavachira P J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2004 Oct; 30(5):358-62. PubMed ID: 15327448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison between single dose of 50 microg oral misoprostol and 25 microg vaginal misoprostol for labor induction. Paisarntantiwong R; Getgan M J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Oct; 88 Suppl 2():S56-62. PubMed ID: 17722318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial. Ozkan S; Calişkan E; Doğer E; Yücesoy I; Ozeren S; Vural B Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19034471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sublingual misoprostol for labor induction: a randomized clinical trial. Wolf SB; Sanchez-Ramos L; Kaunitz AM Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Feb; 105(2):365-71. PubMed ID: 15684166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of orally administered misoprostol to intravenous oxytocin for labor induction in women with favorable cervical examinations. Wing DA; Fassett MJ; Guberman C; Tran S; Parrish A; Guinn D Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jun; 190(6):1689-94; discussion 1694-6. PubMed ID: 15284771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Titrated oral compared with vaginal misoprostol for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial. Cheng SY; Ming H; Lee JC Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jan; 111(1):119-25. PubMed ID: 18165400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Efficacy and safety of six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone: a randomized controlled trial. Denguezli W; Trimech A; Haddad A; Hajjaji A; Saidani Z; Faleh R; Sakouhi M Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2007 Aug; 276(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 17219155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of oral and vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor. Uludag S; Salihoglu Saricali F; Madazli R; Cepni I Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2005 Sep; 122(1):57-60. PubMed ID: 15951101 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prospective randomized clinical trial of inpatient cervical ripening with stepwise oral misoprostol vs vaginal misoprostol. Colón I; Clawson K; Hunter K; Druzin ML; Taslimi MM Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Mar; 192(3):747-52. PubMed ID: 15746667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A randomized clinical trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus cervical Foley plus oral misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction. Hill JB; Thigpen BD; Bofill JA; Magann E; Moore LE; Martin JN Am J Perinatol; 2009 Jan; 26(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 18850516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Vaginally administered misoprostol for outpatient cervical ripening in pregnancies complicated by diabetes mellitus. Incerpi MH; Fassett MJ; Kjos SL; Tran SH; Wing DA Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Oct; 185(4):916-9. PubMed ID: 11641678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cervical ripening before operative hysteroscopy in premenopausal women: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison of vaginal and oral misoprostol. Batukan C; Ozgun MT; Ozcelik B; Aygen E; Sahin Y; Turkyilmaz C Fertil Steril; 2008 Apr; 89(4):966-73. PubMed ID: 17681307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A double-blind randomized trial of two dose regimens of misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction. Diro M; Adra A; Gilles JM; Nassar A; Rodriguez A; Salamat SM; Beydoun SN; O'Sullivan MJ; Yasin SY; Burkett G J Matern Fetal Med; 1999; 8(3):114-8. PubMed ID: 10338065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Oral misoprostol against vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction at term: a randomized comparison]. Henrich W; Dudenhausen JW; Hanel C; Chen FC Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2008 Oct; 212(5):183-8. PubMed ID: 18956276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Vaginal misoprostol versus concentrated oxytocin and vaginal PGE2 for second-trimester labor induction. Ramsey PS; Savage K; Lincoln T; Owen J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jul; 104(1):138-45. PubMed ID: 15229013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effectiveness and safety of a new vaginal misoprostol product specifically labeled for cervical ripening and labor induction. Cecatti JG; Tedesco RP; Pires HM; Calderon IM; Faúndes A Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(6):706-11. PubMed ID: 16752263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]