83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11641788)
1. Role of RAD51 in sister-chromatid exchanges in mammalian cells.
Lambert S; Lopez BS
Oncogene; 2001 Oct; 20(45):6627-31. PubMed ID: 11641788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Low doses of alpha particles do not induce sister chromatid exchanges in bystander Chinese hamster cells defective in homologous recombination.
Nagasawa H; Wilson PF; Chen DJ; Thompson LH; Bedford JS; Little JB
DNA Repair (Amst); 2008 Mar; 7(3):515-22. PubMed ID: 18182331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Inactivation of the RAD51 recombination pathway stimulates UV-induced mutagenesis in mammalian cells.
Lambert S; Lopez BS
Oncogene; 2002 Jun; 21(25):4065-9. PubMed ID: 12037689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Overexpression of mammalian Rad51 does not stimulate tumorigenesis while a dominant-negative Rad51 affects centrosome fragmentation, ploidy and stimulates tumorigenesis, in p53-defective CHO cells.
Bertrand P; Lambert S; Joubert C; Lopez BS
Oncogene; 2003 Oct; 22(48):7587-92. PubMed ID: 14576820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. New insights into the Fanconi anemia pathway from an isogenic FancG hamster CHO mutant.
Tebbs RS; Hinz JM; Yamada NA; Wilson JB; Salazar EP; Thomas CB; Jones IM; Jones NJ; Thompson LH
DNA Repair (Amst); 2005 Jan; 4(1):11-22. PubMed ID: 15533833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Characterization of mammalian RAD51 double strand break repair using non-lethal dominant-negative forms.
Lambert S; Lopez BS
EMBO J; 2000 Jun; 19(12):3090-9. PubMed ID: 10856252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. BRCA1 regulates RAD51 function in response to DNA damage and suppresses spontaneous sister chromatid replication slippage: implications for sister chromatid cohesion, genome stability, and carcinogenesis.
Cousineau I; Abaji C; Belmaaza A
Cancer Res; 2005 Dec; 65(24):11384-91. PubMed ID: 16357146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Genetic interactions between RAD51 and its paralogues for centrosome fragmentation and ploidy control, independently of the sensitivity to genotoxic stresses.
Daboussi F; Thacker J; Lopez BS
Oncogene; 2005 May; 24(22):3691-6. PubMed ID: 15782136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae PDS1 and RAD9 checkpoint genes control different DNA double-strand break repair pathways.
DeMase D; Zeng L; Cera C; Fasullo M
DNA Repair (Amst); 2005 Jan; 4(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 15533838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. BRCA2 regulates homologous recombination in response to DNA damage: implications for genome stability and carcinogenesis.
Abaji C; Cousineau I; Belmaaza A
Cancer Res; 2005 May; 65(10):4117-25. PubMed ID: 15899802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Non-homologous end joining is the responsible pathway for the repair of fludarabine-induced DNA double strand breaks in mammalian cells.
de Campos-Nebel M; Larripa I; González-Cid M
Mutat Res; 2008 Nov; 646(1-2):8-16. PubMed ID: 18812179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Correlation of chromosomal aberrations and sister chromatid exchanges in individual CHO cells pre-labelled with BrdU and treated with DNaseI or X-rays.
Sayed Aly M; Wojcik A; Schunck C; Obe G
Int J Radiat Biol; 2002 Nov; 78(11):1037-44. PubMed ID: 12456291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Distribution of spontaneous and 8-methoxypsoralen-induced sister chromatid exchanges along the length of the 1st chromosome of Chinese hamster cells].
Evgrafov OV; Safronov VV; Evgrafova IN; Makedonov GP
Genetika; 1985 Apr; 21(4):586-90. PubMed ID: 4007486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Regularities in formation of sister chromatid exchanges (SCE) in three generations after irradiation].
Kudriashova OV; Zhloba AA
Tsitologiia; 2000; 42(4):392-8. PubMed ID: 10849934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Molecular mechanisms of sister-chromatid exchange.
Wilson DM; Thompson LH
Mutat Res; 2007 Mar; 616(1-2):11-23. PubMed ID: 17157333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Both CAG repeats and inverted DNA repeats stimulate spontaneous unequal sister-chromatid exchange in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Nag DK; Suri M; Stenson EK
Nucleic Acids Res; 2004; 32(18):5677-84. PubMed ID: 15494455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Altered DNA repair and recombination responses in mouse cells expressing wildtype or mutant forms of RAD51.
Rukść A; Birmingham EC; Baker MD
DNA Repair (Amst); 2007 Dec; 6(12):1876-89. PubMed ID: 17719855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Effect of irradiation at different stages of the mitotic cycle on the formation of sister chromatid exchanges in a Chinese hamster cell culture].
Antoshchina MM; Poriadkova NA; Luchnik NV
Genetika; 1982 Apr; 18(4):634-8. PubMed ID: 7200927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Further characterization of the genotoxicity of formaldehyde in vitro by the sister chromatid exchange test and co-cultivation experiments.
Neuss S; Speit G
Mutagenesis; 2008 Sep; 23(5):355-7. PubMed ID: 18477654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Overexpression of Rad51 inhibits double-strand break-induced homologous recombination but does not affect gene conversion tract lengths.
Paffett KS; Clikeman JA; Palmer S; Nickoloff JA
DNA Repair (Amst); 2005 Jun; 4(6):687-98. PubMed ID: 15878310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
