These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11642096)
1. Patient safety. Why is wrong-site surgery continuing? OR Manager; 2001 Oct; 17(10):33, 35. PubMed ID: 11642096 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Patient safety. A prescription for certainty: a new wrong site surgery protocol. Larson L Trustee; 2004 Apr; 57(4):30-1. PubMed ID: 15119064 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Wrong site surgery and the Universal Protocol. Bull Am Coll Surg; 2006 Nov; 91(11):63. PubMed ID: 18557441 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Who should mark the surgical site? OR Manager; 2004 Jan; 20(1):7. PubMed ID: 14740470 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Marking the site for spinal surgery. OR Manager; 2004 Jan; 20(1):9. PubMed ID: 14740472 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Preoperative site marking for eye surgery may be transferred from patient to patient or moved, increasing the potential for wrong site surgery. Lambley RG; Herbert EN Br J Ophthalmol; 2008 Feb; 92(2):295. PubMed ID: 18227214 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Patient participation in surgical site marking: can this be an additional tool to help avoid wrong-site surgery? Bergal LM; Schwarzkopf R; Walsh M; Tejwani NC J Patient Saf; 2010 Dec; 6(4):221-5. PubMed ID: 21500609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Patient safety and quality in surgery. McCafferty MH; Polk HC Surg Clin North Am; 2007 Aug; 87(4):867-81, vii. PubMed ID: 17888785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Patient safety in surgery]. Gaál C Magy Seb; 2009 Oct; 62(5):316-21. PubMed ID: 19828423 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. JCAHO answers questions on new surgical site-marking stand. OR Manager; 2003 Jul; 19(7):1, 7-10. PubMed ID: 12870355 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Doing right to prevent wrong-site surgery. Ridge RA Nursing; 2008 Mar; 38(3):24-5. PubMed ID: 18418167 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Revisiting the universal protocol. Banschbach SK AORN J; 2009 Feb; 89(2):257-9. PubMed ID: 19200460 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Fine-tuning surgical site verification. OR Manager; 2004 Jan; 20(1):8. PubMed ID: 14740471 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The Joint Commission announces the 2005 National Patient Safety Goals and requirements. Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Aug; 24(8):1, 3-10. PubMed ID: 15446575 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Working together to hit the 'moving target' of health care safety. Jt Comm Perspect; 2002 Aug; 22(8):1, 3. PubMed ID: 12221918 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Frequent questions on marking the surgical site. Department of Veterans Affairs National Center for Patient Safety OR Manager; 2003 Feb; 19(2):18-9. PubMed ID: 12661399 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. JCAHO to hold summit on wrong-site, wrong-procedure, wrong-person surgeries. Jt Comm Perspect; 2003 Mar; 23(3):7-8. PubMed ID: 12685287 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Retired National Patient Safety Goals and requirements. Jt Comm Perspect; 2005 Sep; 25(9):8. PubMed ID: 16515350 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Quality professionals must take lead to eliminate wrong-site surgery. Hosp Peer Rev; 2002 Feb; 27(2):17-20. PubMed ID: 11924066 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Wrong-site surgery: we're not doing all that we can. Healthcare Benchmarks Qual Improv; 2008 Jun; 15(6):49-52. PubMed ID: 18678178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]