134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11642558)
1. Clinical performance of a packable resin composite for posterior teeth after 3 years.
Ernst CP; Martin M; Stuff S; Willershausen B
Clin Oral Investig; 2001 Sep; 5(3):148-55. PubMed ID: 11642558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Two-year clinical performance of a packable posterior composite with and without a flowable composite liner.
Ernst CP; Canbek K; Aksogan K; Willershausen B
Clin Oral Investig; 2003 Sep; 7(3):129-34. PubMed ID: 12898294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical evaluation of packable and conventional hybrid resin-based composites for posterior restorations in permanent teeth: results at 12 months.
Yip KH; Poon BK; Chu FC; Poon EC; Kong FY; Smales RJ
J Am Dent Assoc; 2003 Dec; 134(12):1581-9. PubMed ID: 14719754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical performance of resin composite restorations after 2 years.
Ernst CP; Buhtz C; Rissing C; Willershausen B
Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2002 Aug; 23(8):711-4, 716-7, 720 passim; quiz 726. PubMed ID: 12244738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical performance of a packable resin composite for a period of 3 years.
Türkün LS; Türkün M; Ozata F
Quintessence Int; 2005 May; 36(5):365-72. PubMed ID: 15892534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Eighteen-month clinical evaluation of microhybrid, packable and nanofilled resin composites in Class I restorations.
Sadeghi M; Lynch CD; Shahamat N
J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Jul; 37(7):532-7. PubMed ID: 20202097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Six-year clinical evaluation of packable composite restorations.
Kiremitci A; Alpaslan T; Gurgan S
Oper Dent; 2009; 34(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 19192832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Four-year clinical evaluation of posterior resin-based composite restorations placed using the total-etch technique.
Baratieri LN; Ritter AV
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2001; 13(1):50-7. PubMed ID: 11831309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Two-year clinical performance of a nanofiller vs a fine-particle hybrid resin composite.
Ernst CP; Brandenbusch M; Meyer G; Canbek K; Gottschalk F; Willershausen B
Clin Oral Investig; 2006 Jun; 10(2):119-25. PubMed ID: 16555069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical evaluation of packable and conventional hybrid posterior resin-based composites: results at 3.5 years.
Poon EC; Smales RJ; Yip KH
J Am Dent Assoc; 2005 Nov; 136(11):1533-40. PubMed ID: 16329416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. 3-Year clinical evaluation of posterior packable composite resin restorations.
Loguercio AD; Reis A; Hernandez PA; Macedo RP; Busato AL
J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Feb; 33(2):144-51. PubMed ID: 16457675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Two-year clinical evaluation of a packable resin-based composite.
Türkün LS; Türkün M; Ozata F
J Am Dent Assoc; 2003 Sep; 134(9):1205-12. PubMed ID: 14528992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of the mechanical and physical properties of a posterior resin composite in posterior adult teeth.
Agbaje LO; Shaba OP; Adegbulugbe IC
Niger J Clin Pract; 2010 Dec; 13(4):431-5. PubMed ID: 21220860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Three-year clinical evaluation of different restorative resins in class I restorations.
Yazici AR; Ustunkol I; Ozgunaltay G; Dayangac B
Oper Dent; 2014; 39(3):248-55. PubMed ID: 24754716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Direct resin composite inlays/onlays: an 11 year follow-up.
van Dijken JW
J Dent; 2000 Jul; 28(5):299-306. PubMed ID: 10785294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quality and Survival of Direct Light-Activated Composite Resin Restorations in Posterior Teeth: A 5- to 20-Year Retrospective Longitudinal Study.
Borgia E; Baron R; Borgia JL
J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):e195-e203. PubMed ID: 28513897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Twenty-four-month clinical evaluation of different posterior composite resin materials.
Türkün LS; Aktener BO
J Am Dent Assoc; 2001 Feb; 132(2):196-203; quiz 224-5. PubMed ID: 11217593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A 15-year randomized controlled study of a reduced shrinkage stress resin composite.
van Dijken JW; Lindberg A
Dent Mater; 2015 Sep; 31(9):1150-8. PubMed ID: 26205382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Two-year clinical performance of two one-step self-etching adhesives in the restoration of cervical lesions.
Schattenberg A; Werling U; Willershausen B; Ernst CP
Clin Oral Investig; 2008 Sep; 12(3):225-32. PubMed ID: 18369669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Direct resin composite restorations versus indirect composite inlays: one-year results.
Mendonça JS; Neto RG; Santiago SL; Lauris JR; Navarro MF; de Carvalho RM
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 May; 11(3):025-32. PubMed ID: 20461321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
