These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Selective reduction of multiple pregnancy. Keown J New Law J; 1987 Dec; 137(6335):1165-6. PubMed ID: 11650922 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Selective reduction of pregnancy. Brahams D Gaz Law Soc Upper Can; 1988 Jan; 85(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 11650883 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Selective reduction and feticide: the parameters of abortion. Price DP Crim Law Rev; 1988 Apr; 1988():199-210. PubMed ID: 11650837 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Unfinished feticide: a legal commentary. Brazier M J Med Ethics; 1990 Jun; 16(2):68-70. PubMed ID: 11642779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The new law of abortion: clarification or ambiguity? Grubb A Crim Law Rev; 1991 Sep; [1991]():659-70. PubMed ID: 11656129 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The inadequacies of Australian abortion law. Cica N Aust J Fam Law; 1991 Mar; 5(1):37-68. PubMed ID: 11656112 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Whose foetus is it? Wells C; Morgan D J Law Soc; 1991; 18(4):431-47. PubMed ID: 11656222 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Selective reduction of pregnancy: a legal analysis. Hall A J Med Ethics; 1996 Oct; 22(5):304-8. PubMed ID: 8910784 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990. Great Britain Halsburys Statut Engl G B; 1990 Nov; 38():105-61. PubMed ID: 12041434 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Planned abortion of one twin stirs furor in Britain. Ibrahim YM N Y Times Web; 1996 Aug; ():A3. PubMed ID: 11647166 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Is GIFT illegal? Morgan D New Sci; 1990 Jun; 126(1720):76. PubMed ID: 11655988 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990. Great Britain Bull Med Ethics; 1990 Nov; No. 63():13-21. PubMed ID: 11651088 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Abortion: the unexamined ground. Morgan D Crim Law Rev; 1990 Oct; ():687-94. PubMed ID: 11657369 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Confidentiality and American semen donors. Karow AM Int J Fertil; 1993; 38(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 11659706 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Modern birth technology and human rights. Knoppers BM Am J Comp Law; 1985; 33(1):1-31. PubMed ID: 16100800 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Termination of pregnancy for reason of foetal disability: are there grounds for a special exception in law? Sheldon S; Wilkinson S Med Law Rev; 2001; 9(2):85-109. PubMed ID: 12778928 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]