304 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11642910)
1. Inadequacies with the ACOG and AAP statements on managing ethical conflict during the intrapartum period.
Chervenak FA; McCullough LB
J Clin Ethics; 1991; 2(1):23-4. PubMed ID: 11642910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Lives at stake: how to respond to a woman's refusal of cesarean surgery when she risks losing her child or her life.
Tauer CA
Health Prog; 1992 Sep; 73(3):18, 20-27. PubMed ID: 11652082
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A serious obligation Sharpening a moral argument.
Pellegrino ED; Walter JJ; Tauer CA
Health Prog; 1992 Dec; 73(10):6-7. PubMed ID: 11645751
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Reflection on the physician's responsibility to mother and fetus.
Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Biomedical Ethics Committee
Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can; 1993 Apr; 26(2):109-12. PubMed ID: 11659577
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Prematernal duty and the resolution of conflict.
Yeast JD
Bioethics Forum; 1995; 11(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 11653277
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Resisting the temptation to turn medical recommendations into judicial orders: a reconsideration of court-ordered surgery for pregnant women.
Scott C
Ga State Univ Law Rev; 1994 May; 10(4):615-89. PubMed ID: 11656420
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The judge in the delivery room: the emergence of court-ordered cesareans.
Rhoden NK
Calif Law Rev; 1986 Dec; 74(6):1951-2030. PubMed ID: 11658950
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Obstetric ethics and the abortion controversy.
Chervenak FA; McCullough LB
Am J Ethics Med; 1994; 3(1):3-6. PubMed ID: 11652828
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Compelled cesarean section. An ethical perspective.
Doukas DJ; Elkins TE
Prim Care; 1993 Sep; 20(3):721-8. PubMed ID: 8378462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An ethically based standard of care for fetal therapy.
Chervenak FA; McCullough LB
J Matern Fetal Investig; 1991; 1():175-80. PubMed ID: 11659969
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Jehovah's Witnesses, pregnancy, and blood transfusions: a paradigm for the autonomy rights of all pregnant women.
Levy JK
J Law Med Ethics; 1999; 27(2):171-89. PubMed ID: 11657465
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Court-ordered cesareans: a growing concern for indigent women.
Daniels JA
Clgh Rev; 1988 Feb; 21(9):1064-71. PubMed ID: 11649972
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Planning on a miracle: the case of mother versus fetus.
Paris JJ
Christ Century; 1994 Mar; 111(8):244-5. PubMed ID: 11659999
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A womb of my own: a moral evaluation of Ohio's treatment of pregnant patients with living wills.
Lederman AD
Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1994; 45(1):351-77. PubMed ID: 11656507
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Forced medical treatment of pregnant women: "compelling each to live as seems good to the rest.
Nelson LJ; Buggy BP; Weil CJ
Hastings Law J; 1986 May; 37(5):703-63. PubMed ID: 11655855
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Compulsory treatment of pregnant women.
Nelson LJ
Clin Ethics Rep; 1987 May; 1(5):1-8. PubMed ID: 11659055
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Ethical issues in recommending and offering fetal therapy.
Chervenak FA; McCullough LB
West J Med; 1993 Sep; 159(3):369-99. PubMed ID: 11643180
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Beyond abortion: refusal of caesarean section.
Mahowald M
Bioethics; 1989 Apr; 3(2):106-21. PubMed ID: 11649241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Can a pregnant woman morally refuse fetal surgery?
Knopoff KA
Calif Law Rev; 1991 Mar; 79(2):499-540. PubMed ID: 11659841
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. New medical technology: a chance to reexamine court-ordered medical procedures during pregnancy.
Ouellette A
Albany Law Rev; 1994; 57(3):927-60. PubMed ID: 11652868
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
