413 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11642931)
1. Anticruelty care: commentary.
Braithwaite SS
J Clin Ethics; 1991; 2(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 11642931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Refusal of life-sustaining treatment for terminally ill incompetent patients: court orders and an alternative.
Rubin BL
Columbia J Law Soc Probl; 1985; 19(1):19-68. PubMed ID: 11658755
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Withholding and withdrawing life support.
Raffin TA
Hosp Pract; 1991 Mar; 26(3):133-136, 140-141, 145. PubMed ID: 11652589
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Someone make up my mind: the troubling right to die issues presented by incompetent patients with no prior expression of a treatment preference.
Richard SM
Notre Dame Law Rev; 1989; 64(3):394-421. PubMed ID: 11659243
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Missing persons: legal perceptions of incompetent patients.
Dresser R
Rutgers Law Rev; 1994; 46(2):609-719. PubMed ID: 11660406
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Substituted judgment and the terminally-ill incompetent.
Santurri EN; Werpehowski W
Thought; 1982 Dec; 57(227):484-501. PubMed ID: 11649637
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Quality of life judgments and medical indications.
Thomasma DC
Qual Life Cardiovasc Care; 1986; 2(3):113-8. PubMed ID: 11659003
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A Jewish approach to end-stage medical care.
Dorff EN
Conserv Jud; 1991; 43(3):3-51. PubMed ID: 11651008
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The encouragment of empathy: just decisionmaking for incompetent terminal patients.
Oxman ML
J Law Health; 1988-1989; 3(2):189-217. PubMed ID: 11652566
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Conroy, best interests, and the handling of dying patients.
Cantor NL
Rutgers Law Rev; 1985; 37(3):543-77. PubMed ID: 11649747
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Perspectives on Cruzan: the sirens' lure of invented consent -- a critique of autonomy-based surrogate decisionmaking for legally-incapacitated older persons.
Bopp J; Avila D
Hastings Law J; 1991 Mar; 42(3):779-815. PubMed ID: 11652587
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Deciding for others.
Buchanan A; Brock DW
Milbank Q; 1986; 64(Suppl. 2):17-94. PubMed ID: 11649884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Constitutional development of judicial criteria in right-to-die cases: from brain dead to persistent vegetative state.
Morgan R; Harty-Golder B
Wake Forest Law Rev; 1988; 23(4):721-65. PubMed ID: 11652556
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Setting floating limits: functional status care categories as national policy.
Thomasma DC
Bus Prof Ethics J; 1990; 9(3 and 4):133-46. PubMed ID: 11651033
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Surrogate consent.
Richards N
Public Aff Q; 1992 Apr; 6(2):227-43. PubMed ID: 11652630
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Artificial feeding for severely disoriented, elderly patients.
McAlister NH; McAlister NK; Challin CG
Can Fam Physician; 1989 May; 35():1057-62. PubMed ID: 11659211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The limits of proxy decisionmaking for incompetents.
Buchanan AE
UCLA Law Rev; 1981; 29(2):386-408. PubMed ID: 11660397
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Therefore choose death?
Appelbaum PS; Klein JI
Commentary; 1986 Apr; 81(4):23-9. PubMed ID: 11658682
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The "small beginnings" of euthanasia: examining the erosion in legal prohibitions against mercy-killing.
Koop CE; Grant ER
Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 1986; 2(3):585-634. PubMed ID: 11650885
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Forgoing medical treatment: to withdraw, withhold, deny.
Cotler M
Semin Anesth; 1991 Sep; 10(3):163-9. PubMed ID: 11651354
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
