These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11643010)

  • 1. The Norplant condition: protecting the unborn or violating fundamental rights?
    Persels J
    J Leg Med; 1992 Jun; 13(2):237-62. PubMed ID: 11643010
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Norplant meets the new eugenicists: the impermissibility of coerced contraception.
    Mertus J; Heller S
    St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1992; 11(2):359-83. PubMed ID: 11652703
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Norplant debate: birth control or woman control?
    Spitz SS
    Columbia Human Rights Law Rev; 1993; 25(1):131-69. PubMed ID: 11652335
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The constitutionality of the use of the Norplant contraceptive device as a condition of probation.
    Burke M
    Hastings Constit Law Q; 1992; 20(1):207-46. PubMed ID: 11652186
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Norplant: the new scarlet letter?
    Flannery MT
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1992; 8():201-26. PubMed ID: 11645739
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A limited role for the legal system in responding to maternal substance abuse during pregnancy.
    Myers JE
    Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 1991; 5(3):747-81. PubMed ID: 11651057
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Criminal liability for substance abuse during pregnancy: the controversy of maternal v. fetal rights.
    Dobson T; Eby KK
    St Louis Univ Law J; 1992; 36(3):655-94. PubMed ID: 11659686
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Substance abuse during pregnancy.
    Moss K
    Harv Womens Law J; 1990; 13():278-99. PubMed ID: 11656055
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Norplant prescription: birth control, women control, or crime control?
    Arthur SL
    UCLA Law Rev; 1992 Oct; 40(1):1-101. PubMed ID: 11652185
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The legal status of the unborn after Webster.
    Parness JA
    Dickinson Law Rev; 1990; 95(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 11659394
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Norplant condition: one step forward or two steps back?
    Ballard T
    Harv Womens Law J; 1993; 16():139-87. PubMed ID: 11652871
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prosecution of mothers of drug-exposed babies: constitutional and criminal theory.
    McGinnis DM
    Univ PA Law Rev; 1990 Dec; 139(2):505-39. PubMed ID: 11651407
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Court-ordered prenatal intervention: a final means to the end of gestational substance abuse.
    Flannery MT
    J Fam Law; 1991-1992; 30(3):519-604. PubMed ID: 11659750
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The constitutionality of court-imposed birth control as a condition of probation.
    Lipton JP; Campbell CF
    N Y Law School Hum Rights Annu; 1989; 6(2):271-98. PubMed ID: 11652002
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Legal issues: drug testing of postpartum women and newborns as the basis for civil and criminal proceedings.
    Moss KL
    Clgh Rev; 1990 Mar; 23(11):1406-14. PubMed ID: 11659232
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Crime, race, and reproduction.
    Roberts DE
    Tulane Law Rev; 1993 Jun; 67(6):1945-77. PubMed ID: 11652259
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Norplant use in conjunction with the welfare system.
    Funk AM
    South Calif Interdiscip Law J; 1993; 2(1):147-63. PubMed ID: 11652714
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Beyond survival: the procreative rights of women with HIV.
    Boockvar K
    Boston Coll Third World Law J; 1994; 14(1):1-42. PubMed ID: 11652889
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pregnant women's rights and the legal impact of theories of when life begins.
    Crepps J; Miller A
    Am J Ethics Med; 1994; 3(1):28-9. PubMed ID: 11652827
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Defining the boundaries of personal privacy: is there a paternal interest in compelling therapeutic fetal surgery?
    Blickenstaff DC
    Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1994; 88(3):1157-99. PubMed ID: 11656414
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.