These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11643047)

  • 1. German doctors struggle to keep 15 week fetus viable.
    Karcher HL
    BMJ; 1992 Oct; 305(6861):1047-8. PubMed ID: 11643047
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Persistent vegetative state: guidelines.
    British Medical Association. Medical Ethics Committee
    Bull Med Ethics; 1993 Jun; No. 89():8-10. PubMed ID: 11656587
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Should a brain-dead pregnant woman carry her child to full term? The case of the "Erlanger baby".
    Anstötz C
    Bioethics; 1993 Jul; 7(4):340-50. PubMed ID: 11651609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A time to be born and a time to die: a pregnant woman's right to die with dignity.
    Mulholland KA
    Indiana Law Rev; 1987; 20(4):859-78. PubMed ID: 11652514
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The constitutionality of pregnancy clauses in living will statutes.
    Benton EC
    Vanderbilt Law Rev; 1990 Nov; 43(6):1821-37. PubMed ID: 11656069
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pregnancy clauses in living will statutes.
    MacAvoy-Snitzer J
    Columbia Law Rev; 1987 Oct; 87(6):1280-300. PubMed ID: 11652510
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Compelling pregnancy at death's door.
    Taylor KA
    Columbia J Gend Law; 1997; 7(1):85-165. PubMed ID: 16184655
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Abortion to obtain fetal tissue for transplant.
    Robertson JA
    Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1993; 27(4):1359-89. PubMed ID: 11657042
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Court-ordered cesareans: can a pregnant woman refuse?
    Leavine BA
    Houst Law Rev; 1992; 29(1):185-218. PubMed ID: 11656666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Balancing the right to die with competing interests: a socio-legal enigma.
    Peterson GW
    Pepperdine Law Rev; 1985; 13(1):109-55. PubMed ID: 11658936
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Incubator or individual?: the legal and policy deficiencies of pregnancy clauses in living will and advance health care directive statutes.
    Burch TJ
    MD Law Rev; 1995; 54(2):528-70. PubMed ID: 11653265
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Regulating women's bodies: the adverse effect of fetal rights theory on childbirth decisions and women of color.
    Krauss DJ
    Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev; 1991; 26(2):523-47. PubMed ID: 11652068
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Moral sentiment in judicial opinions on abortion.
    Moore EN
    Santa Clara Lawyer; 1975; 15(3):591-634. PubMed ID: 11663584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The recent amendments to the Texas Natural Death Act: implications for health care providers.
    Greenfield RE
    St Marys Law J; 1986; 17(3):1003-51. PubMed ID: 11652489
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Posthumous reproduction.
    Robertson JA
    Indiana Law J; 1994; 69(4):1027-65. PubMed ID: 11653158
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comprehensive look at Connecticut's living will statute.
    Lieberson A
    Conn Probate Law J; 1992; 7(1):49-113. PubMed ID: 11653117
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Death with dignity in Mississippi? An analysis of Mississippi's Natural Death Act.
    Vitiello M
    Miss Law J; 1984; 54(3&4):459-507. PubMed ID: 11652509
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ruling by a court keeps fetus alive.
    N Y Times Web; 1986 Jul; ():7. PubMed ID: 11647823
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perfect mothers, perfect babies: an examination of the ethics of fetal treatments.
    Kaufmann CL
    Reprod Genet Eng; 1988; 1(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 11650373
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prenatal invasions and interventions: what's wrong with fetal rights?
    Gallagher J
    Harv Womens Law J; 1987; 10():9-58. PubMed ID: 11649954
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.