181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11643085)
1. Fraud in drug research.
Brahams D
Lancet; 1992 Aug; 340(8817):477-8. PubMed ID: 11643085
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Fraud and misconduct in clinical research: is it prejudicial to patient safety?
Wells F
Adverse Drug React Acute Poisoning Rev; 1992; 11(4):241-55. PubMed ID: 11652183
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Fraud and misconduct in clinical research.
Wells F
Account Res; 1997; 5(1-3):25-38. PubMed ID: 11654814
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. GMC gets tough with fraudulent doctors.
Dillner L
BMJ; 1991 Dec; 303(6816):1493. PubMed ID: 11642956
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Research ban on fraudulent doctor.
Brahams D
Lancet; 1993 Jan; 341(8836):45. PubMed ID: 11643225
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. GMC finds GPs guilty of fraud.
Dyer O
BMJ; 1994 Apr; 308(6937):1122. PubMed ID: 11644557
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Consultant struck off over research fraud.
Dyer C
BMJ; 1997 Jul; 315(7102):205. PubMed ID: 11644983
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Research fraud: discouraging the others.
Lock S
BMJ; 1990 Dec; 301(6765):1348. PubMed ID: 11642809
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Criminal liability for misconduct in scientific research.
Kuzma SM
Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1992; 25(2):357-421. PubMed ID: 11651584
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Scientific misconduct: undue process.
Efron R
Account Res; 1993; 3(2-3):223-38. PubMed ID: 11652297
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Commentary: the university and research ethics.
Steneck NH
Sci Technol Human Values; 1984; 9(4):6-15. PubMed ID: 11649609
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The legal standing of local research ethics committees.
Mander T
Med Law Int; 1996; 2(2):149-68. PubMed ID: 11657549
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Data audit by a regulatory agency: its effect and implication for others.
Shapiro MF
Account Res; 1992; 2(3):219-29. PubMed ID: 11653981
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A doctor's drug studies turn into fraud.
Eichenwald K; Kolata G
N Y Times Web; 1999 May; ():A1, A16. PubMed ID: 11647660
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Bias in science and medical knowledge: the Opren controversy.
Abraham J
Sociology; 1994 Aug; 28(3):717-36. PubMed ID: 11658101
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Research fraud.
Lock S
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1992 Mar; 74B(2):173-4. PubMed ID: 11654313
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. UK royal college responds to scientific fraud.
Ramsay S
Lancet; 1995 Jun; 345(8964):1566. PubMed ID: 11657385
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Innovation and integrity in biomedical research.
Jasanoff S
Acad Med; 1993 Sep; 69(9 Suppl):S91-5. PubMed ID: 11652808
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Time to face up to research misconduct.
Smith R
BMJ; 1996 Mar; 312(7034):789-90. PubMed ID: 8608272
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Institutional policies for responding to allegations of research fraud.
Greene PJ; Durch JS; Horwitz W; Hooper VS
IRB; 1986; 8(4):1-7. PubMed ID: 11653742
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
