These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
42. Psychotropic drug-treatment refusal by competent psychiatric patients. Weatherhead R Univ Tor Fac Law Rev; 1988; 47(1):101-31. PubMed ID: 11655975 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Mental health--the right to refuse drug therapy under "emergency restraint statutes". McGovern JJ New Engl Law Rev; 1976; 11(2):509-40. PubMed ID: 11664602 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. The presumption for treatment: has it been justified? Rhoden NK Law Med Health Care; 1985 Apr; 13(2):65-7. PubMed ID: 11643872 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. The new Ohio Mental Health Act. Gui J; Bradin SS; Lavin JJ Akron Law Rev; 1977; 11(1):104-81. PubMed ID: 11665001 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Mandatory hospitalisation in mental health. Mordini E Bull Med Ethics; 1997 Nov; No. 133():18-21. PubMed ID: 11655252 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Major tranquilizers in prison: drug therapy and the unconsenting inmate. Sitnick SA Willamette Law J; 1975; 11(3):378-97. PubMed ID: 11664569 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. The substituted judgment approach: its difficulties and paradoxes in mental health settings. Gutheil TG; Appelbaum PS Law Med Health Care; 1985 Apr; 13(2):61-4. PubMed ID: 11643871 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Patients' rights vs. patients' needs: the right of the mentally ill to refuse treatment in Colorado. Shavill NL Denver Law J; 1981; 58(3):567-608. PubMed ID: 11662885 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Autonomy, self determination, the right of involuntarily committed persons to refuse treatment, and the use of substituted judgment in medication decisions involving incompetent persons. Hermann DH Int J Law Psychiatry; 1990; 13(4):361-85. PubMed ID: 2286496 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Informed consent and the voluntary psychiatric patient. Mrazek ML Leg Med Q; 1996; 20(Pt.4):13-20. PubMed ID: 11660714 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. When ethics and the law collide. Weinstein BD; Brushwood DB US Pharm; 1990 Dec; 15(12):64, 66, 68. PubMed ID: 11659659 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. The right of mentally ill patients in South Africa to refuse treatment. Allan A; Allan M S Afr Law J; 1997; 114(Pt. 4):724-37. PubMed ID: 11660580 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. The involuntary commitment and treatment of mentally ill persons. Humber JM Soc Sci Med F; 1981 Dec; 15F(4):143-50. PubMed ID: 11649360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Paternalism and the marginally competent: an ethical dilemma, no easy answer. Kelly TB J Gerontol Soc Work; 1994; 23(1-2):67-84. PubMed ID: 11660764 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. The right of a mental patient to refuse antipsychotic drugs in an institution. Gaughan LD; LaRue LH Law Psychol Rev; 1978; 4():43-85. PubMed ID: 11662727 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. The ethics of enforced medical treatment: the balance model. Eastman NL; Hope RA J Appl Philos; 1988; 5(1):49-59. PubMed ID: 11659257 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Pennsylvania's new Mental Health Procedures Act: due process and the right to treatment for the mentally ill. Lundeen PA Dickinson Law Rev; 1977; 81(3):627-47. PubMed ID: 11664828 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Drug-induced alteration of psychotic behavior: who benefits? Schaefer GJ J Law Health; 1994-1995; 9(1):43-68. PubMed ID: 11654455 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. New York court says mentally ill have right to refuse medication. Gross J N Y Times Web; 1986 Jun; ():A1, B10. PubMed ID: 11646485 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]