151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11643103)
1. Public uses Denmark's living will.
Dolley M
BMJ; 1993 Feb; 306(6875):414-5. PubMed ID: 11643103
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. What right to die?
Rosen J
New Repub; 1996 Jun; 214(26):28-31. PubMed ID: 11656670
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Public attitudes on the legalization of euthanasia.
Roper Poll
Euthan Rev; 1986; 1(3):177-85. PubMed ID: 11653791
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The living will: already a practical alternative.
Akers SR
Tex Law Rev; 1977 Mar; 55(4):665-717. PubMed ID: 11661495
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Withdrawal of life support: conflict among patient wishes, family, physicians, courts and statutes, and the law.
Tarantino LM
Buffalo Law Rev; 1994; 42(2):623-52. PubMed ID: 11652996
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The 'crucible of the bedside'.
Med World News; 1985 May; 26(9):112-4. PubMed ID: 11645551
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Mercy killing, euthanasia and aiding and abetting suicide, etc., under Danish law.
Greve V
Scand Stud Law; 1981; 25():91-107. PubMed ID: 11651903
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Is there a right to die? A study of the law of euthanasia.
Tolentino AS
Philipp Law J; 1974 Sep; 49(4):444-61. PubMed ID: 11663007
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A new form of medical malpractice?: Missouri's "living will" statute.
Murphy RE
J Mo Bar; 1986; 42(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 11649874
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Natural death.
Wisconsin
Wis Sess Laws Wis; 1984; ():. PubMed ID: 12038387
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The living will and the will to live.
Dempsey D
N Y Times Mag; 1974 P 11-13+; 23 Jun 1974():. PubMed ID: 11663244
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Euthanasia questions stir new debate.
Med World News; 1973 Sep; 14():73-78+. PubMed ID: 11662931
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Physician-assisted lethal injection vs. the plastic bag: will euthanasia legislation ever come? A comparison of standards in the Netherlands and the United States.
Joas UA
Temple Int Comp Law J; 1992; 6(2):365-401. PubMed ID: 11660113
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Roper poll shows support for euthanasia, clemency for mercy killer.
Humphry D
Euthan Rev; 1987; 2(1 2):76-9. PubMed ID: 11649220
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The Court's role in decisionmaking involving incompetent refusals of life-sustaining care and psychiatric medications.
Parry JW
Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1990; 14(6):468-76. PubMed ID: 11659325
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Living wills: the need for uniform state laws.
Warnock HC
Probate Prop; 1991; 5(3):52-6. PubMed ID: 11652620
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Judicial innovation and policy re-invention: state supreme courts and the right to die.
Glick HR
West Polit Q; 1992; ():71-92. PubMed ID: 11652627
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Innovative legislative initiatives: the New Jersey Declaration of Death and Advance Directives for Health Care Acts.
Armstrong PW; Olick RS
Seton Hall Legis J; 1992; 16(1):177-97. PubMed ID: 11653079
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Medical ethics in life and death.
Thompson R
Editor Res Rep; 1984 Feb; 1(8):147-68. PubMed ID: 11652477
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Allowing death or actively killing? The legal situation and present state of ethical debate in the Nordic countries.
Arendt R
Ethics Med; 1989; 5(3):45-7. PubMed ID: 11650338
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
