These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11643115)
1. The contract motherhood debate: Surrogate Motherhood: Politics and Privacy, edited by Larry Gostin. Callahan JC J Clin Ethics; 1993; 4(1):82-91. PubMed ID: 11643115 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. In the matter of Baby M: rejudged. Raymond JG Reprod Genet Eng; 1988; 1(2):175-81. PubMed ID: 11650375 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Reproductive technology and intent-based parenthood: an opportunity for gender neutrality. Shultz MM Wis L Rev; 1990; 1990(2):297-398. PubMed ID: 11652059 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Privacy, surrogacy, and the Baby M case. Allen AL Georgetown Law J; 1988 Jun; 76(5):1759-92. PubMed ID: 11649250 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. From the individual to the dividual: in the supermarket of "reproductive alternatives. Mies M Reprod Genet Eng; 1988; 1(3):225-37. PubMed ID: 11650396 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. What does it mean to be a "parent"? The claims of biology as the basis for parental rights. Hill JL N Y Univ Law Rev; 1991 May; 66(2):353-420. PubMed ID: 11659546 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Response of Professor Field. Field MA Politics Life Sci; 1991 Feb; 9(2):262-8. PubMed ID: 11656634 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. "Surrogate mothering" and women's freedom: a critique of contracts for human reproduction. Shanley ML Signs (Chic); 1993; 18(3):618-39. PubMed ID: 11659996 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. In defense of enforcement of the surrogate contract: a reply to Field. Hill JL Politics Life Sci; 1991 Feb; 9(2):253-61. PubMed ID: 11656633 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Dilemmas of the new birth technologies. Thom M Ms; 1988 May; 16(11):70-72, 74-76. PubMed ID: 11658995 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Report on Australian national conference: "Surrogacy -- In Whose Interest?", Melbourne, February 1991. Salomone J Issues Reprod Genet Eng; 1992; 5(1):79-94. PubMed ID: 11651336 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Feminist perspectives on reproductive technologies: the politics of motherhood. Chokr NN Technol Soc; 1992; 14(3):317-33. PubMed ID: 11652187 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Embryos, families, and procreative liberty: the legal structure of the new reproduction. Robertson JA South Calif Law Rev; 1986 Jul; 59(5):939-1041. PubMed ID: 11655852 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Providing protection for collaborative noncoital reproduction: surrogate motherhood and other new procreative technologies, and the right of intimate association. Ikemoto LC Rutgers Law Rev; 1988; 40(4):1273-309. PubMed ID: 11650138 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. New wine in old skins: using paternity-suit settlements to facilitate surrogate motherhood. Clark NL J Fam Law; 1987 Apr; 25(3):483-527. PubMed ID: 11658883 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Alternative birth technologies: legal challenges. Capron AM Univ Calif Davis Law Rev; 1987; 20(4):679-704. PubMed ID: 11659041 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The case against enforcement of surrogacy contracts. Field MA Politics Life Sci; 1990 Feb; 8(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 11650311 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Status and contract in surrogate motherhood: an illumination of the surrogacy debate. Dolgin JL Buffalo Law Rev; 1990; 38(2):515-50. PubMed ID: 11650993 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]