These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11643115)
21. Technology and motherhood: legal and ethical issues in human egg donation. Robertson JA Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1988-1989; 39(1):1-38. PubMed ID: 11659264 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Selling the womb: can the feminist critique of surrogacy be answered? Lieber KB Indiana Law J; 1992; 68(1):205-32. PubMed ID: 11659688 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. The case for enforcement of the surrogate contract. Hill JL Politics Life Sci; 1990 Feb; 8(2):147-60. PubMed ID: 11650306 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Surrogate gestator: a new and honorable profession. Ingram JD Marquette Law Rev; 1993; 76(4):675-99. PubMed ID: 11656585 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Where speech has lost its power: a social ethical reflection on the meaning of surrogate motherhood. Hewitt MA Tor J Theol; 1990; 6(1):44-55. PubMed ID: 11651339 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. A critique of pregnancy contracts: comments on articles by Hill, Merrick, Shevory, and Woliver. Okin SM Politics Life Sci; 1990 Feb; 8(2):205-10. PubMed ID: 11650312 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Debunking the rhetoric of surrogacy arrangements. Appleby B Tor J Theol; 1990; 6(1):27-43. PubMed ID: 11651338 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. In re Baby M. New Jersey. Superior Court, Chancery Division, Family Part, Bergen County Atl Report; 1987 Mar; 525():1128-76. PubMed ID: 11648146 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A case against pregnancy contracts: embodied selves, liberal theory and the law. Shanley ML Politics Life Sci; 1990 Feb; 8(2):216-20. PubMed ID: 11650314 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. The rights of the biological father: from adoption and custody to surrogate motherhood. Stanton ER Vt Law Rev; 1987; 12(1):87-121. PubMed ID: 11658956 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. The deflective power of reproductive technologies: the impact on women. Woliver LR Women Polit; 1989; 9(3):17-47. PubMed ID: 11659737 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Designing an ethical frame for motherhood by contract. Eckholm E N Y Times Web; 1987 Jan; ():6E. PubMed ID: 11646160 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Surrogacy: for love but not for money? Anleu SR Gend Soc; 1992 Mar; 6(1):30-48. PubMed ID: 11659538 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Wombs for rent, selves for sale? Smith DH J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1988; 4():23-36. PubMed ID: 11645611 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Reproductive technologies and surrogacy: legal issues. Field M Creighton Law Rev; 1992 Nov; 25(5):1589-98. PubMed ID: 11653381 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. How (not) to think about surrogacy and other reproductive innovations. Shapiro MH Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1994; 28(3):647-80. PubMed ID: 11655181 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Surrogate law: the decision in a novel case in New Jersey could have wide-reaching implications for infertile couples and surrogate motherhood. Galen M Natl Law J; 1986 Sep; 9(3):1, 8, 10. PubMed ID: 11658784 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. The surrogate motherhood agreement: a proposed standard form contract for Quebec. Kasirer N Rev Droit; 1985; 16(1):351-87. PubMed ID: 11658942 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Draft report on surrogacy issued by the Australian National Bioethics Consultative Committee -- the debate on surrogacy in Australia continues Response to the draft report of the National Bioethics Consultative Committee (NBCC), Surrogacy. Ewing C; Rowland R Issues Reprod Genet Eng; 1990; 3(2):143-57. PubMed ID: 11650919 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]