These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11643115)
41. Ethical issues in the new reproductive technologies: perspectives from feminism and the psychology profession. Tangri SS; Kahn JR Prof Psychol Res Pr; 1993 Aug; 24(3):271-80. PubMed ID: 11652331 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Parental rights and gestational surrogacy: an argument against the genetic standard. Russell-Brown SL Columbia Human Rights Law Rev; 1992; 23(2):525-54. PubMed ID: 11659610 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. The implications of Davis v. Davis for reproductive rights analysis. Prygoski PJ Tenn Law Rev; 1994; 61(2):609-46. PubMed ID: 11652933 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. New U.S. know-how in Frankfurt -- a "surrogate mother" agency. Winkler U Reprod Genet Eng; 1988; 1(2):205-7. PubMed ID: 11650376 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Rumpelstiltskin revisited: the inalienable rights of surrogate mothers. Harv Law Rev; 1986 Jun; 99(8):1936-55. PubMed ID: 11655817 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. What, if anything, is wrong with baby selling? Radin MJ Pac Law J; 1995 Jan; 26(2):135-45. PubMed ID: 11660370 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Liberty and assisted reproduction. Robertson JA Trial; 1994 Aug; 30(8):48-53. PubMed ID: 11654494 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. The abortion debate: the search for common ground, part 2. Davis NA Ethics; 1993 Jul; 103(4):731-78. PubMed ID: 11656201 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Surrogacy and autonomy. Dodds S; Jones K Bioethics; 1989 Jan; 3(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 11650109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Reproductive technologies and surrogacy: policy concerns for women. Woliver LR Politics Life Sci; 1990 Feb; 8(2):185-93. PubMed ID: 11650309 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Gestational surrogacy: unsettling state parentage law and surrogacy policy. Hofheimer A Rev Law Soc Change; 1992; 19(3):571-616. PubMed ID: 11659977 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Legal aspects of artificial human reproduction: can the law afford to play ostrich? Clapshaw D Auckl Univ Law Rev; 1982 Jun; 4(3):254-72. PubMed ID: 11658651 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Commercial contracts and human connectedness. Heyl BS Society; 1988; 25(3):11-6. PubMed ID: 11654687 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. In vitro fertilization and surrogate motherhood: the Jewish view. Rosner F J Relig Health; 1983; 22(2):139-60. PubMed ID: 11658738 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Babies for sale. Fox R Public Interest; 1993; 11():14-40. PubMed ID: 11656370 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. In re Baby M. New Jersey. Supreme Court Atl Report; 1988 Feb; 537():1227-73. PubMed ID: 11648559 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. The itinerant embryo and the neo-nativity scene: bifurcating biological maternity. O'Brien S Utah Law Rev; 1987; 1987-1(1):1-33. PubMed ID: 11658919 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Touchdowns, toddlers, and taboos: on paying college athletes and surrogate contract mothers. Rush SE Ariz Law Rev; 1989; 31(3):549-614. PubMed ID: 11659320 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Sexuality, privacy and the new biology. Smith GP; Iraola R Marquette Law Rev; 1984; 67(2):263-91. PubMed ID: 11658703 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]