These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11643245)
1. Anencephalic baby's right to life. McCarthy M Lancet; 1993 Oct; 342(8876):919. PubMed ID: 11643245 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Child abuse by whom? -- Parental rights and judicial competency determinations: the Baby K and Baby Terry cases. Bopp J; Coleson RE Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1994; 20(4):821-46. PubMed ID: 11652997 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. In re Baby K. U.S. District Court, E.D. Virginia, Alexandria Division Fed Suppl; 1993 Jul; 832():1022-31. PubMed ID: 11648613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Baby K's mother gives her the prayer that many deny she has. Tousignant M; Miller B Washington Post; 1994 Oct; ():A1, A8-9. PubMed ID: 11647052 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A legal challenge to the refusal to provide inappropriate treatment: the case of Baby K. Watson SB Clin Ethics Rep; 1994; 8(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 11652775 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Court order to treat baby with partial brain prompts debate on costs and ethics. Greenhouse L N Y Times Web; 1994 Feb; ():20. PubMed ID: 11647018 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. When a patient demands what health care providers deem foolish: medical-ethical analysis of the case of Baby K. Peabody JL Clin Ethics Rep; 1993; 7(4):1-12. PubMed ID: 11653093 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Hospital appeals decision ordering treatment for baby missing a brain. Greenhouse L N Y Times Web; 1993 Sep; ():A10. PubMed ID: 11646990 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Two American hospitals in dilemma over brain death. Charatan FB BMJ; 1994 Mar; 308(6929):618. PubMed ID: 11644525 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. In re Baby K. U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit Fed Report; 1994 Feb; 16():590-9. PubMed ID: 11648610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Baby K: protected at law. Bopp J; Coleson RE Trends Health Care Law Ethics; 1994; 9(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 7950150 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Death of 'Baby K' leaves a legacy of legal precedents. Tousignant M; Miller B Washington Post; 1995 Apr; ():B3. PubMed ID: 11647076 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Commentary: what is really at stake in Baby K? A response to Ellen Flannery. Clayton EW J Law Med Ethics; 1995; 23(1):13-4. PubMed ID: 11644715 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. British court allows terminally ill baby to die. Dyer C BMJ; 1997 Nov; 315(7120):1398. PubMed ID: 11645006 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Withholding medical treatment from infants: when is it child neglect? Knepper K Univ Louisv J Fam Law; 1994-1995 Winter; 33(1):1-53. PubMed ID: 11653286 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The "right to die" in America: sloganeering from Quinlan and Cruzan to Quill and Kevorkian. Annas GJ Duquesne Law Rev; 1996; 34(4):875-97. PubMed ID: 11657348 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Delivery room resuscitation of the high-risk infant: a conflict of rights. Cooper R Cathol Lawyer; 1990; 33(4):325-60. PubMed ID: 11659422 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The sanctity of life and substituted judgement: the case of Baby J. Hornett SI Ethics Med; 1991; 7(2):2-5. PubMed ID: 11652022 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The tyranny of technology: the case of Baby K. Benesch K Trends Health Care Law Ethics; 1994; 9(1):47-8. PubMed ID: 7950149 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Medical futility: a futile concept? Shiner K Wash Lee Law Rev; 1996; 53(2):803-48. PubMed ID: 11656798 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]