156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11643288)
1. The Court and the Commission.
Menzel P
Hastings Cent Rep; 1975 Oct; 5(5):14-6. PubMed ID: 11643288
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Brain birth: a proposal for defining when a fetus is entitled to human life status.
Gertler GB
South Calif Law Rev; 1986 Jul; 59(5):1061-78. PubMed ID: 11655850
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Fetal experimentation: rights of the father and questions of personhood.
Wilson JP
Villanova Law Rev; 1977 Jan; 22(2):403-17. PubMed ID: 11664801
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Ethical issues in fetal research.
Prescott JW
Humanist; 1975; 35(3):37-8. PubMed ID: 11664439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Abortion and the Constitution: the need for a life-protective amendment.
Destro RA
Calif Law Rev; 1975 Sep; 63(5):1250-351. PubMed ID: 11663611
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Human life amendment.
Helms J
Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1977 Jan; 123(4):S436-45. PubMed ID: 11664767
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Can Congress create people?
Buckley WF; Galebach SH; Bork R; Pilpel H
Hum Life Rev; 1981; 7(3):87-108. PubMed ID: 11655601
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The Human Life Bill: some issues and answers.
Hyde HJ
NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1982; 27(4):1077-100. PubMed ID: 11651773
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The new pro-life legislation: patterns and recommendations.
Witherspoon JP
St Marys Law J; 1976; 7(4):637-97. PubMed ID: 11664635
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Hyde and go seek: a response to Representative Hyde.
Pilpel HF
NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1982; 27(4):1101-23. PubMed ID: 11651774
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Semantic problems of fetal resarch.
Pilon JG
Hum Life Rev; 1976; 2(3):89-95. PubMed ID: 11663655
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Rationalizing the abortion debate: legal rhetoric and the abortion controversy.
Chemerinsky E
Buffalo Law Rev; 1982; 31(1):107-64. PubMed ID: 11655711
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The Human Life Bill: personhood revisited, or Congress takes aim at Roe v. Wade.
Ferreira JG
Hofstra Law Rev; 1982; 10(4):1269-95. PubMed ID: 11655632
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A human life statute.
Galebach SH
Hum Life Rev; 1981; 7(1):5-33. PubMed ID: 11651719
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Abortion and human rights.
Horan DJ; Gorby JD
Hum Life Rev; 1976; 2(3):21-33. PubMed ID: 11663654
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Haunting shadows from the rubble of Roe's right of privacy.
Haley JN
Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1974; 9(1):145-84. PubMed ID: 11664401
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Fetal politics: the debate on experimenting with the unborn.
Gaylin W; Lappé M
Atl Mon; 1975 May; 235(5):66-71. PubMed ID: 11663535
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A decision-theoretic reconstruction of Roe v. Wade.
Lockhart T
Public Aff Q; 1991 Jul; 5(3):243-58. PubMed ID: 11656064
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The "right" to an abortion, the scope of Fourteenth Amendment "personhood," and the Supreme Court's birth requirement.
Gorby JD
South Ill Univ Law J; 1979; 1979(1):1-36. PubMed ID: 12083082
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. A human life amendment.
Helms J
Hum Life Rev; 1977; 3(2):7-42. PubMed ID: 11663729
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
