These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11643304)

  • 41. Damage control for victims of physical assault: testing the innocent for AIDS.
    Bruyere MP
    Fla State Univ Law Rev; 1994; 21(3):945-79. PubMed ID: 11660259
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The doctor's duty of disclosure.
    Orwoll G
    Anesth Analg; 1974; 53(5):759-63. PubMed ID: 4472356
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Consent to medical care of minors: who has authority in Texas?
    Farrell HC
    Texas Bar J; 1979 Jan; 42(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 11664115
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Legislative control of shock treatment.
    Moore E
    Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1975; 9(4):738-77. PubMed ID: 11664532
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Artificial insemination.
    Sagall EL
    Trial; 1973; 9(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 11664272
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Patient consent in Louisiana.
    Dewey EP
    Loyola Law Rev; 1981; 27(4):1166-83. PubMed ID: 11658777
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Informed consent civil actions for post-abortion psychological trauma.
    Eller TR
    Notre Dame Law Rev; 1996; 71(4):639-70. PubMed ID: 11660407
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Contraceptive sterilization: the need for state regulation.
    Motley CE
    Gold Gate Law Rev; 1975; 6(1):79-99. PubMed ID: 11661332
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Informed consent--the doctor's dilemma.
    Shula RJ
    J Indiana State Med Assoc; 1973 Feb; 66(2):113-6. PubMed ID: 4687449
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The effect of the Texas Medical Liability and Insurance Improvement Act on the Texas standard for medical disclosure.
    Rachlin SK
    Houst Law Rev; 1980 Mar; 17(3):615-41. PubMed ID: 11658267
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Therapeutic abortion and the minor.
    Gibbs RF
    J Leg Med (N Y); 1973; 1(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 11662355
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Recent legislation on genetics and insurance.
    Davis HR; Mitrius JV
    Jurimetrics; 1996; 37(1):69-82. PubMed ID: 11658097
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. HIV-specific crime legislation: targeting an epidemic for criminal prosecution.
    O'Toole EM
    J Law Health; 1995-1996; 10(1):183-208. PubMed ID: 11655191
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A survey of North Carolina's treatment of the doctrine of informed consent.
    Grubbs WG
    Wake Forest Law Rev; 1986; 21(3):757-77. PubMed ID: 11658959
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Informed consent to abortion: a refinement.
    Jipping TL
    Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1987-1988 Winter; 38(3):329-86. PubMed ID: 11659038
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Informed consent: still a doctor's dilemma.
    Brown EN
    Can Med Assoc J; 1980 Oct; 123(8):811-2. PubMed ID: 7448684
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Patients' rights and informed consent: an emergency case for hospitals?
    Callan DE
    Calif West Law Rev; 1976; 12(2):406-28. PubMed ID: 11664656
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The doctrines of lack of consent and lack of informed consent in medical procedures in Louisiana.
    Boland GL
    LA Law Rev; 1983 Sep; 45(1):1-38. PubMed ID: 11658587
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The availability of abortion, sterilization, and other medical treatment for minor patients.
    Dunn LJ
    UMKC Law Rev; 1975; 44(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 11664542
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Constitutional law--a state may constitutionally regulate the abortion decision during the first trimester of pregnancy if it can show that the regulation is necessary to protect a compelling state interest.
    Wodtke AK
    Drake Law Rev; 1976; 26(3):716-27. PubMed ID: 11664788
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.