These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. The politics of deoxyribonucleic acid. Budrys A New Repub; 1977 Apr; 176(16):18-21. PubMed ID: 11662375 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Judgement of the people. Norman C Nature; 1977 Jan; 265(5590):98-9. PubMed ID: 11643358 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A science for the people. King J New Sci; 1977 Jun; 74(1056):634-6. PubMed ID: 11663772 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Gene transplants stir communities' fears; scientists are split. Gumpert D Wall St J (East Ed); 1976 Sep; ():1+. PubMed ID: 11649045 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Can scientists be trusted on hazardous research? Fields CM Chron High Educ; 1976 Aug; 12(21):4-5. PubMed ID: 11661340 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Science vs. the public. Norman C Nature; 1976 Jul; 262(5565):163-5. PubMed ID: 11643318 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Ordinance for the use of recombinant DNA molecule technology in the City of Cambridge. Cambridge, Massachusetts. City Council Camb Munic Code 1988 Camb Mass; 1977; Chapter 11 Article II():. PubMed ID: 12041502 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Cambridge, Mass., council sets up DNA review. Norman C Sci Gov Rep; 1976 Aug; 6(13):4-6. PubMed ID: 11661417 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Threat to US genetic engineering. Chedd G New Sci; 1976 Jul; 71(1007):14-5. PubMed ID: 11663684 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Recombinant DNA: legal responses to a new biohazard. Balmer TA Environ Law; 1977; 7(2):293-313. PubMed ID: 11661448 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The regulation of recombinant DNA research: the alternative of local control. Rosenblatt DP Boston Coll Environ Aff Law Rev; 1982; 10(1):37-78. PubMed ID: 11649694 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Reasonableness versus rationality in the construction and justification of science policy decisions: the case of the Cambridge Experimentation Review Board. Waddell C Sci Technol Human Values; 1989; 14(1):7-25. PubMed ID: 11650830 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. DNA research curbs: compromise at Cambridge. Norman C Sci Gov Rep; 1977 Jan; 7(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 11661392 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Recombinant DNA meets the Cambridge City Council. Sci News; 1976 Jul; 110(3):36. PubMed ID: 11661363 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Recombinant DNA research: a debate on the benefits and risks. Davis BD; Chargaff E; Krimsky S Chem Eng News; 1977 May; 55(22):26-42. PubMed ID: 11661587 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. College community votes curb on genetic research. Schumacher E Washington Post; 1977 Feb; ():A2. PubMed ID: 11648842 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Gene-splicing: Cambridge citizens OK research but want more safety. Wade N Science; 1977 Jan; 195(4275):268-9. PubMed ID: 11643356 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]