191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11643354)
1. Amicus curiae brief in the Donaldson case.
American Psychiatric Association
Am J Psychiatry; 1975 Jan; 132(1):109-15. PubMed ID: 11643354
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. O'Connor v. Donaldson: the Supreme Court sidesteps the right to treatment.
Winthrop LF
Calif West Law Rev; 1976; 13(1):168-87. PubMed ID: 11664747
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Constitutional law--simple custodial confinement of civilly committed nondangerous mentally ill violates constitutional right to freedom.
Concemi M
Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1975; 10(1):76-99. PubMed ID: 11664545
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Toward a right to treatment for civilly committed mental patients.
Belzer I
UMKC Law Rev; 1975; 44(1):23-48. PubMed ID: 11664543
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Involuntary psychiatry.
Szasz TS
Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1976; 45(3):347-65. PubMed ID: 11664781
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The significance for psychology of O'Connor v. Donaldson: a reply to Bernard.
Siegel RA
Am Psychol; 1978 Sep; 33(9):858-61. PubMed ID: 11643479
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A review of major implications of the O'Connor v. Donaldson decision.
Kopolow LE
Am J Psychiatry; 1976 Apr; 133(4):379-83. PubMed ID: 1267034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Supreme Court rules against involuntary custodial confinement of the nondangerous mentally ill.
Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1975 Sep; 26(9):616+. PubMed ID: 11643281
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. O'Connor v. Donaldson: constitutional law--mental health--a state cannot constitutionally confine without more, a nondangerous individual adjudged to be mentally ill.
Fields JD
Hofstra Law Rev; 1976; 4(2):511-30. PubMed ID: 11664626
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. O'Connor v. Donaldson. 26 Jun 1975.
U.S. Supreme Court
U S Rep U S Supreme Court; 1975; 422():563-89. PubMed ID: 12038358
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. o'Connor v. Donaldson: due process rights of mental patients in state hospitals.
Anderson K
Rev Law Soc Change; 1976; 6(1):65-82. PubMed ID: 11664777
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Rights and dignity: Congress, the Supreme Court, and people with disabilities after Pennhurst.
Ferleger D; Scott PM
West New Engl Law Rev; 1983; 5(3):327-61. PubMed ID: 11658602
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A constitutional right to treatment: past, present, and future.
Wallach S
Prof Psychol; 1976 Nov; 7(4):453-67. PubMed ID: 11664666
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The Supreme Court sidesteps the right to treatment question.
Univ Colo Law Rev; 1976; 47(2):299-323. PubMed ID: 11664633
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. O'Connor v. Donaldson: impact in the states.
Clayton T
Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1976 Apr; 27(4):272-81. PubMed ID: 1261980
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. o'Connor v. Donaldson: the death of the quid pro quo argument for a right to treatment?
Bliss TP
Clevel State Law Rev; 1975; 24(3):557-71. PubMed ID: 11661275
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. o'Connor v. Donaldson: a right to liberty for the nondangerous mentally ill.
Muller MJ
Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1975; 3(2):550-62. PubMed ID: 11664550
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Donaldson v. O'Connor: constitutional right to treatment for the involuntary civilly committed.
Jernigan LT
North Carol Centr Law J; 1975; 7(1):174-86. PubMed ID: 11664561
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The significance for psychology of O'Connor v. Donaldson.
Bernard JL
Am Psychol; 1977 Dec; 32(12):1085-8. PubMed ID: 596714
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Compelling treatment in the community: distorted doctrines and violated values.
Schwartz SJ; Costanzo CE
Loyola Los Angel Law Rev; 1987 Jun; 20(4):1329-429. PubMed ID: 11658983
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
