These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11643358)

  • 1. Judgement of the people.
    Norman C
    Nature; 1977 Jan; 265(5590):98-9. PubMed ID: 11643358
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Gene transplants stir communities' fears; scientists are split.
    Gumpert D
    Wall St J (East Ed); 1976 Sep; ():1+. PubMed ID: 11649045
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The politics of deoxyribonucleic acid.
    Budrys A
    New Repub; 1977 Apr; 176(16):18-21. PubMed ID: 11662375
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A science for the people.
    King J
    New Sci; 1977 Jun; 74(1056):634-6. PubMed ID: 11663772
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Recombinant DNA: legal responses to a new biohazard.
    Balmer TA
    Environ Law; 1977; 7(2):293-313. PubMed ID: 11661448
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The regulation of recombinant DNA research: the alternative of local control.
    Rosenblatt DP
    Boston Coll Environ Aff Law Rev; 1982; 10(1):37-78. PubMed ID: 11649694
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Genetic manipulation: guidelines issued.
    Norman C
    Nature; 1976 Jul; 262(5563):2-4. PubMed ID: 11643317
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Can scientists be trusted on hazardous research?
    Fields CM
    Chron High Educ; 1976 Aug; 12(21):4-5. PubMed ID: 11661340
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Science vs. the public.
    Norman C
    Nature; 1976 Jul; 262(5565):163-5. PubMed ID: 11643318
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Threat to US genetic engineering.
    Chedd G
    New Sci; 1976 Jul; 71(1007):14-5. PubMed ID: 11663684
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Recombinant DNA: Cambridge City Council votes moratorium.
    Culliton BJ
    Science; 1976 Jul; 193(4250):300-1. PubMed ID: 11643322
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Science that frightens scientists: the great debate over DNA.
    Bennett W; Gurin J
    Atl Mon; 1977 Feb; 237(2):43-50+. PubMed ID: 11661393
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Recombinant DNA research: a debate on the benefits and risks.
    Davis BD; Chargaff E; Krimsky S
    Chem Eng News; 1977 May; 55(22):26-42. PubMed ID: 11661587
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Science vs. politics in Boston.
    Suzuki DT
    Sci Forum; 1977 Jun; 10(3):16. PubMed ID: 11650573
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cambridge, Mass., council sets up DNA review.
    Norman C
    Sci Gov Rep; 1976 Aug; 6(13):4-6. PubMed ID: 11661417
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A case analysis of NEPA implementation: NIH and DNA recombinant research.
    Chalker SM; Catz RS
    Duke Law J; 1978 Mar; 1978(1):57-112. PubMed ID: 11661621
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Recombinant DNA and the regulation of biotechnology: reflections on the Asilomar Conference, ten years after.
    Barkstrom JE
    Akron Law Rev; 1985; 19(1):81-126. PubMed ID: 11650740
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An unprecedented debate.
    Norman C
    Nature; 1977 Feb; 265(5595):575-7. PubMed ID: 11643373
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dealing with experts: the recombinant DNA debate.
    Park B; Thacher S
    Sci People; 1977; 9(5):28-35. PubMed ID: 11662396
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Gene-splicing: at grass-roots level a hundred flowers bloom.
    Wade N
    Science; 1977 Feb; 195(4278):558-60. PubMed ID: 11643359
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.