These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11643359)

  • 1. Gene-splicing: at grass-roots level a hundred flowers bloom.
    Wade N
    Science; 1977 Feb; 195(4278):558-60. PubMed ID: 11643359
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An unprecedented debate.
    Norman C
    Nature; 1977 Feb; 265(5595):575-7. PubMed ID: 11643373
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. State biotechnology oversight: the juncture of technology, law, and public policy.
    Vito CC
    Maine Law Rev; 1993; 45(2):329-83. PubMed ID: 11652701
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Judgement of the people.
    Norman C
    Nature; 1977 Jan; 265(5590):98-9. PubMed ID: 11643358
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Recombinant DNA and the regulation of biotechnology: reflections on the Asilomar Conference, ten years after.
    Barkstrom JE
    Akron Law Rev; 1985; 19(1):81-126. PubMed ID: 11650740
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dealing with experts: the recombinant DNA debate.
    Park B; Thacher S
    Sci People; 1977; 9(5):28-35. PubMed ID: 11662396
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Government regulation of the pursuit of knowledge: the recombinant DNA controversy.
    Berger RG
    Vt Law Rev; 1978; 3():83-110. PubMed ID: 11662474
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. DNA regulation bill hits roadblock again.
    Wehr E
    Congr Q Wkly Rep; 1978 May; 36(21):1331-5. PubMed ID: 11662693
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biotechnology and culture: the impact of public debates on government regulation in the United States and Denmark.
    Baark E; Jamison A
    Technol Soc; 1990; 12(1):27-44. PubMed ID: 11650912
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Law vs. science: legal control of genetic research.
    Becker F
    KY Law J; 1977; 65(4):880-94. PubMed ID: 11661534
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The double helix of self-interest.
    Simring FR
    Sciences (New York); 1977; 17(3):10-13+. PubMed ID: 11661478
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Gene transplants stir communities' fears; scientists are split.
    Gumpert D
    Wall St J (East Ed); 1976 Sep; ():1+. PubMed ID: 11649045
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Genetic manipulation: guidelines issued.
    Norman C
    Nature; 1976 Jul; 262(5563):2-4. PubMed ID: 11643317
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The regulation of recombinant DNA research: the alternative of local control.
    Rosenblatt DP
    Boston Coll Environ Aff Law Rev; 1982; 10(1):37-78. PubMed ID: 11649694
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. DNA advisers recommend the same controls for industry as universities.
    Dickson D
    Nature; 1979 May; 279(5712):360-1. PubMed ID: 11662588
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Corporate responsibility for recombinant DNA activities.
    Berger BA
    Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1981; 12(4):913-24. PubMed ID: 11649592
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Gene splicing preemption rejected.
    Wade N
    Science; 1977 Apr; 196(4288):406. PubMed ID: 11643369
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Introduction to recombinant DNA research, development and evolution of the NIH guidelines, and proposed legislation.
    Talbot B
    Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1981; 12(4):804-14. PubMed ID: 11649587
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Recombinant DNA research; availability of environmental assessment for public comment; request for comments on need for a programmatic environmental impact statement; notice.
    U.S. National Institutes of Health
    Fed Regist; 1985 Apr; 50(72):14794-6. PubMed ID: 11645548
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Can scientists be trusted on hazardous research?
    Fields CM
    Chron High Educ; 1976 Aug; 12(21):4-5. PubMed ID: 11661340
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.