These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11643400)

  • 1. The new P4 laboratories: containing recombinant DNA.
    Marx JL
    Science; 1977 Sep; 197(4311):1350-2. PubMed ID: 11643400
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mack v. Califano. 23 Feb 1978.
    U.S. District Court, District of Columbia
    Fed Suppl; 1978; 447():668-71. PubMed ID: 11645921
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. DNA lab: Fort Detrick room set for genetic engineering.
    Colen BD
    Washington Post; 1978 Mar; ():B1+. PubMed ID: 11648735
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Hazardous Substance and New Organisms law reform proposal in New Zealand.
    Kennedy LD
    Australas Biotechnol; 1993; 3(3):165-6. PubMed ID: 7763850
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Way is cleared for genetic experiments.
    Weil M
    Washington Post; 1978 Feb; ():A3. PubMed ID: 11648888
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Recombinant DNA hearing at Harvard: nine scientists disagree.
    Pipkin FM
    Boston Univ J; 1976; 24(3):5-21. PubMed ID: 11661367
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. U. of Michigan sets stringent DNA controls.
    Sci Gov Rep; 1976 Jun; 6(10):8. PubMed ID: 11661423
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. 'Genetic engineering'--the manifest hazards.
    Anderson ES
    New Sci; 1978 Jul; 79(1110):34-5. PubMed ID: 11663873
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Recombinant DNA research guidelines: draft environmental impact statement.
    U.S. National Institutes of Health
    Fed Regist; 1976 Sep; 41(176):38426-83. PubMed ID: 11663693
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. New debate as NIH issues genetic guidelines... Cambridge mayor opposes new Harvard lab.
    Norman C
    Sci Gov Rep; 1976 Jul; 6(12):4-5. PubMed ID: 11661416
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Recombinant DNA research: actions under guidelines.
    U.S. National Institutes of Health
    Fed Regist; 1984 Nov; 49(227):46256-63. PubMed ID: 11655641
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The DNA debate.
    Armentrout RW; Randal J
    Med Dimens; 1978; 7(6):14+. PubMed ID: 11663291
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. GMAG wants to stay on.
    Walgate R
    Nature; 1978 May; 273(5660):259. PubMed ID: 11643458
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Recombinant DNA research; actions under guidelines; notice.
    U.S. National Institutes of Health
    Fed Regist; 1984 Apr; 49(81):17844-8. PubMed ID: 11655581
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Keeping the gene genie in the bottle.
    Yanchinski S
    New Sci; 1983 Apr; 98(1353):69-71. PubMed ID: 11655531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The great 'recombinant DNA' controversy and the need for public debate.
    Pearson M
    Sci Forum; 1977 Jun; 10(3):3-4+. PubMed ID: 11650574
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Oncogene researchers may run cancer risk.
    Yanchinski S
    New Sci; 1983 Aug; 99(1372):530. PubMed ID: 11655573
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Recombinant DNA: NIH Guidelines.
    Singer M; Berg P
    Science; 1976 Jul; 193(4249):186-8. PubMed ID: 11643320
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cambridge, Mass., council sets up DNA review.
    Norman C
    Sci Gov Rep; 1976 Aug; 6(13):4-6. PubMed ID: 11661417
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Scientific progress and the common good: the dilemma of recombinant DNA.
    Schachter H
    Leg Med Q; 1977 Mar; 1(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 11645436
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.