These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11643479)

  • 21. O'Connor v. Donaldson: retelling a classic and finding some revisionist history.
    Behnke SH
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1999; 27(1):115-26. PubMed ID: 10212031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. "Crazy" until proven innocent? Civil commitment of the mentally ill homeless.
    Kaufman MS
    Columbia Human Rights Law Rev; 1988; 19(2):333-67. PubMed ID: 11659184
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Abandoned but not forgotten: the illegal confinement of elderly people in state psychiatric institutions.
    Kanter AS
    Rev Law Soc Change; 1991-1992; 19():273-307. PubMed ID: 11659687
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. O'Connor v. Donaldson: a defacto right to treatment?
    Welch S
    Law Psychol Rev; 1977; 3():99-106. PubMed ID: 11665183
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Constitutional law--right to liberty--involuntary confinement of mental patients.
    Tenn Law Rev; 1976; 43(2):366-73. PubMed ID: 11664691
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Rights within the therapeutic relationship.
    King P
    J Law Health; 1991-1992; 6(1):31-60. PubMed ID: 11659514
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Toward a right to treatment for civilly committed mental patients.
    Belzer I
    UMKC Law Rev; 1975; 44(1):23-48. PubMed ID: 11664543
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. o'Connor v. Donaldson: due process and the involuntarily civilly committed mental patient.
    Wold SM
    Tulsa Law J; 1976; 11(4):604-14. PubMed ID: 11664640
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Amicus curiae brief in the Donaldson case.
    American Psychiatric Association
    Am J Psychiatry; 1975 Jan; 132(1):109-15. PubMed ID: 11643354
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Youngberg v. Romeo: the right to treatment dilemma and the mentally retarded.
    Gallo LV
    Albany Law Rev; 1982; 47(1):179-213. PubMed ID: 11658597
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The "right to treatment": can the courts rehabilitate and cure?
    Miller HL
    Public Interest; 1977; (46):. PubMed ID: 11664773
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. "Without more": a constitutional right to treatment?
    Lipscomb NI
    Loyola Law Rev; 1975 Winter 1975; 22(1):373-83. PubMed ID: 11664670
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A review of the Burger Court: Part I.
    Parry J
    Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1984; 8(6):502-8. PubMed ID: 11658589
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Warren Burger and the civil commitment tetralogy.
    Shuman D
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 1980; 3(2):155-61. PubMed ID: 7002809
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Constitutional law--confinement of nondangerous mentally ill capable of surviving safely in freedom held to violate patient's right to "liberty".
    Hancock GC
    Univ Richmond Law Rev; 1976; 10(2):402-9. PubMed ID: 11664793
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Constitutional law--due process--civil commitment--absent treatment, a nondangerous mentally ill person able to survive safely in society has a constitutional right to release.
    Burnstin SM
    Wash Law Rev; 1976 Jul; 51(3):764-90. PubMed ID: 11664654
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The right to refuse antipsychotic medications: law and policy.
    Brooks AD
    Rutgers Law Rev; 1987; 39(2-3):339-76. PubMed ID: 11659012
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. High court establishes rights for retarded in institutions.
    Barbash F
    Washington Post; 1982 Jun; ():A1, A5. PubMed ID: 11647762
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Developments in the law: civil commitment of the mentally ill.
    Harv Law Rev; 1974 Apr; 87(6):1190-406. PubMed ID: 11664523
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Two treatment rights cases argued at U.S. Supreme Court.
    Ment Disabil Law Rep; 1982; 6(1):12-3. PubMed ID: 11652364
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.