These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11643501)

  • 1. The tragic case of Karen Ann Quinlan.
    Healey JM
    Conn Med; 1979 Jun; 43(6):399. PubMed ID: 11643501
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In the shadow of Karen Quinlan.
    Bennett SA
    Trial; 1976 Sep; 12(9):36-41. PubMed ID: 11664653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Around the Karen Quinlan case: interview with Judge R. Muir.
    Bai K; Muir R
    Int J Med Law; 1979; 1(1):45-67. PubMed ID: 11662747
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In re L.H.R.
    Paulus SM
    Issues Law Med; 1985 Nov; 1(3):233-6. PubMed ID: 11644498
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. VHA ethics rounds:
    Bernat JL
    NCCE News; 1995; 3(2):4-5. PubMed ID: 11657132
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. MDs, lawyers probe ethical, legal issues in ending treatment.
    Bolsen B
    Am Med News; 1984 Apr; 27(13):11-3. PubMed ID: 11653535
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Quinlan decision.
    Lyons C
    Christ Crisis; 1976 May; 36(8):103-4. PubMed ID: 11661438
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Life-support withdrawal: law of commiseration or principle?
    Byrnes JC
    Md J Contemp Leg Issues; 1991; 2(2):331-54. PubMed ID: 11651213
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Quinlan case hinged on 'privacy'. Karen Ann could not be denied the right to refuse treatment, court held.
    Med World News; 1976 May; 17(10):43-4. PubMed ID: 11664623
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Surrogate decision making for mentally incapacitated adults.
    Nelson LJ; Golenski JD
    Clin Ethics Rep; 1987 Feb-Mar-Apr; 1(2 3 & 4):1-28. PubMed ID: 11650108
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In the Matter of the Conservatorship of Rudolfo Torres Conservatee.
    Paulus SM
    Issues Law Med; 1985 Nov; 1(3):237-41. PubMed ID: 11644499
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Foregoing nutrition and hydration.
    Nelson LJ
    Clin Ethics Rep; 1987 Jan; 1(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 11652511
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In re Quinlan: a synthesis of law and medical technology.
    Hyland WF; Baime DS
    Rutgers Camden Law J; 1976; 8(1):37-64. PubMed ID: 11663167
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The right to a natural death.
    Csank JF
    Hum Life Rev; 1978; 4(1):44-54. PubMed ID: 11661546
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Decisionmaking in authorizing and withholding life sustaining medical treatment: from Quinlan to Cruzan.
    Keilitz I; Bilzor JC; Hafemeister TL; Brown V; Dudyshyn D
    Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1989; 13(5):482-93. PubMed ID: 11654759
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A critique of Louisiana's approach to withholding medical treatment from defective newborns.
    Goichman G
    South Univ Law Rev; 1983; 9(2):157-84. PubMed ID: 11652508
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Rasmussen v. Fleming.
    Pollard CT
    Issues Law Med; 1987; 3(3):297-310. PubMed ID: 11644117
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Confusion over the language of the Baby Doe regulations.
    Bermel J
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Dec; 16(6):2. PubMed ID: 11643944
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nat Hentoff on the babies Doe.
    McFadden JP; Hentoff N
    Hum Life Rev; 1984; 10(2):73-104. PubMed ID: 11651744
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Therefore, choose death.
    Brown ML
    Human Rights; 1982; 10(3):38-45. PubMed ID: 11651709
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.