107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11643535)
1. Human experimentation.
Behrens LB
Fed Proc; 1973 Feb; 32(2):115-7. PubMed ID: 11643535
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Human experimentation: the review process in practice.
Cowan DH
Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1975; 25(3):533-64. PubMed ID: 11661165
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Human guinea pigs: Congress considering limits.
Congr Q Wkly Rep; 1973 Mar; 31(10):519-22. PubMed ID: 11662080
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Who shall decide when doctors disagree? A review of the legal development of informed consent and the implications of proposed lay review of human experimentation.
Ratnoff MF
Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1975; 25(3):472-532. PubMed ID: 11661164
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The regulation of human experimentation in the United States--a personal odyssey.
Katz J
IRB; 1987; 9(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 11649890
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Human experimentation: the regulation controversy.
Society; 1975; 13(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 11662982
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The protection of human subjects: an open letter to NIH.
Reynolds PD
Am Sociol; 1974 Nov; 9(4):221-5. PubMed ID: 11663254
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Human experimentation regulations: too little or too much?
FAS Prof Bull; 1975 Feb; 3(2):1-8. PubMed ID: 11664436
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Developing guidelines.
Chalkley DT
Clin Res; 1973 Oct; 21(4):777-81. PubMed ID: 11660970
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. IRBs and pharmaceutical company funding of research.
Jellinek MS; Levine RJ
IRB; 1982 Oct; 4(8):9-10. PubMed ID: 11651693
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. An act...to establish a program of National Research Service Awards...and to provide for the protection of human subjects involved in biomedical and behavioral research.... Approved 12 Jul 1974.
U.S
US Statut Large; 1974; 88 342-354():2-354. PubMed ID: 12085916
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. HEW proposed policy on the protection of human subjects: experimentation and the institutionalized mentally disabled.
Wash Univ Law Q; 1975; 1975(3):745-74. PubMed ID: 11662989
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The burgeoning law of medical experimentation involving human subjects.
Bryant LE
John Marshall J Pract Proced; 1974; 8(1):19-51. PubMed ID: 11663465
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Changing federal regulation of IRBs, Part III: social research and the proposed DHEW regulations.
Gray BH
IRB; 1980 Jan; 2(1):1-5+. PubMed ID: 11661793
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The IRB's role in assessing the generalizability of non-NIH-funded clinical trials.
Weijer C
IRB; 1998; 20(2-3):1-5. PubMed ID: 11656912
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Institutional review boards and public health research: an analysis.
Hogue LL
Univ Ark Little Rock Law J; 1978; 1(2):428-54. PubMed ID: 11661619
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Medical science, the clinical trial and society.
Marston RQ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1973 Apr; 3(2):1-4. PubMed ID: 11660997
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. IRBs and epidemiologic research: how inappropriate restrictions hamper studies.
Cann CI; Rothman KJ
IRB; 1984; 6(4):5-7. PubMed ID: 11649562
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Commission says institutional review boards should change procedures now.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1999 Jan; 14(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 11657555
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The concept of the IRB and bureaucratic reality: an exchange of letters.
van Eys J; Levine RJ
IRB; 1984; 6(4):8-10. PubMed ID: 11649563
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
