These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11643552)

  • 1. Anticipating informed consent: an empirical approach.
    Berscheid Ee
    Am Psychol; 1973 Oct; 28(10):913-25. PubMed ID: 11643552
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The informed consent dilemma: an empirical approach.
    Michaels TF; Oetting ER
    J Soc Psychol; 1979 Dec; 109(2):223-30. PubMed ID: 11665208
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A confederate's perspective on deception.
    Oliansky A
    Ethics Behav; 1991; 1(4):253-8. PubMed ID: 11651141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Research ethics at the empirical side: Research Ethics: A Psychological Approach, edited by Barbara Stanley, Joan Sieber, and Gary Melton; Illusions of Reality: A History of Deception in Social Psychology, by James Korn.
    Herrera CD
    Theor Med Bioeth; 1999 Apr; 20(2):191-200. PubMed ID: 11660620
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How (un)acceptable is research involving deception?
    Smith CP
    IRB; 1981 Oct; 3(8):1-4. PubMed ID: 11650527
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Legal and ethical aspects of nonreactive social psychological research: an excursion into the public mind.
    Wilson DW; Donnerstein E
    Am Psychol; 1976 Nov; 31(11):765-73. PubMed ID: 11643346
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Attitudes toward the use of deception in psychologically induced pain.
    Lustig BA; Coverdale J; Bayer T; Chiang E
    IRB; 1993; 15(6):6-8. PubMed ID: 11654097
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Experiments to answer questions raised by the use of deception in psychological research. I. Role playing as an alternative to deception. II. Effectiveness of debriefing after a deception. 3. Effect of informed consent on deception.
    Holmes DS; Bennett DH
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1974 Mar; 29(3):358-67. PubMed ID: 4814125
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Participants' understanding of the process of psychological research: informed consent.
    Brody JL; Gluck JP; Aragon AS
    Ethics Behav; 1997; 7(4):285-98. PubMed ID: 11655335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. APA adopts detailed code on human experimentation.
    Holden C
    Science; 1973 Feb; 179(4074):662. PubMed ID: 11662071
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Deception methods in psychology: have they changed in 23 years?
    Sieber JE; Iannuzzo R; Rodriguez B
    Ethics Behav; 1995; 5(1):67-85. PubMed ID: 11654171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Coparticipant effects on subjects' decisions to consent for risk-involving research.
    Finney PD
    J Soc Psychol; 1984 Oct; 124(First half):35-41. PubMed ID: 11653799
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Informed consent procedures in telephone interviews.
    Singer E; Frankel MR
    Am Sociol Rev; 1982 Jun; 47(3):416-27. PubMed ID: 11658359
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Openness and honesty versus coercion and deception in psychological research.
    Menges RJ
    Am Psychol; 1973 Dec; 28(12):1030-4. PubMed ID: 4764200
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Deception in social research I: kinds of deception and the wrongs they may involve.
    Sieber JE
    IRB; 1982 Nov; 4(9):1-5. PubMed ID: 11649501
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Deception in social research II: evaluating the potential for harm or wrong.
    Sieber JE
    IRB; 1983; 5(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 11649509
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ethics, or issues in methodology?
    Noble W
    Aust Psychol; 1983 Mar; 18(1):25-38. PubMed ID: 11653704
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Research through deception.
    Hunt M
    N Y Times Mag; 1982 Sep; ():66-67, 138, 140+. PubMed ID: 11649613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The civil liberties of the participants in psychological research.
    Waterman AS
    Am Psychol; 1974 Jun; 29(6):470-1. PubMed ID: 11663247
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Deception in medical and behavioral research: is it ever acceptable?
    Wendler D
    Milbank Q; 1996; 74(1):87-114. PubMed ID: 8596525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.