These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. The extraordinary confusion over "the right to die". Goldberg JH Med Econ; 1977 Jan; 54(1):121-2. PubMed ID: 11661494 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The right to die decently. Rubin H Nation; 1978 Feb; 266(4):114-6. PubMed ID: 11661602 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. States tackle flood of 'right-to-die' bills. Alsofrom J Am Med News; 1977 Jun; 20(25):11-2. PubMed ID: 11661479 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The 'right to die': legislative and judicial developments. Horan DJ Linacre Q; 1979 Feb; 46(1):57-70. PubMed ID: 11661637 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Md. Assembly gets 'right to die' bill. Barbash F Washington Post; 1974 Feb; ():M2. PubMed ID: 11648655 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Right to die is approved by Assembly in Trenton. King W N Y Times Web; 1991 Jun; ():B1. PubMed ID: 11646897 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The right to die: new options in California. Steel WE Christ Century; 1976 Nov; 93(37):996-7. PubMed ID: 11661348 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. California's pioneering right-to-die act may have only negligible impact. Lewis R Mod Healthc; 1976 Nov; 6(5):14-5. PubMed ID: 11661589 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. New 'wills' allow people to reject prolonging of life in fatal illness. Otten AL Wall St J (East Ed); 1985 Jul; ():35. PubMed ID: 11647353 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Death with dignity and the "living will": a commentary on legislative developments. Horan DJ; Marzen TJ J Legis; 1978; 5(46):81-8. PubMed ID: 11649456 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Indiana's living wills and life-prolonging procedures act. Kolb JB Indiana Law Rev; 1986; 19(1):285-98. PubMed ID: 11649856 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A critical analysis of the Arkansas death with dignity act. Simpson HH; Armbrust CB Univ Ark Little Rock Law J; 1978; 1(2):473-87. PubMed ID: 11661620 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A multiple-choice living will. N Y Times Web; 1990 Dec; ():A34. PubMed ID: 11646798 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Proposed state euthanasia statutes: a philosophical and legal analysis. Kapner E Hofstra Law Rev; 1975; 3(3):115-40. PubMed ID: 11661928 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. To die or not to die. Collins ER N Y Times Web; 1984 Apr; ():A27. PubMed ID: 11646153 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The living will--death with dignity or mechanical vitality. Wilson PH Cumberland Law Rev; 1979; 10(1):163-207. PubMed ID: 11661825 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Euthanasia: the right to be 'let' alone. Hill RE South Univ Law Rev; 1980; 7(1):101-12. PubMed ID: 11649557 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Give me liberty and give me death: the right to die and the California Natural Death Act. Beraldo C Santa Clara Law Rev; 1980; 20(4):971-91. PubMed ID: 11649458 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Indiana's Living Wills and Life-Prolonging Procedures Act: a reform proposal. Mooney CA Indiana Law Rev; 1987; 20(2):539-58. PubMed ID: 11649962 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]