125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11643737)
21. Biotechnology and open university science.
Grobstein C
Sci Technol Human Values; 1985; 10(2):55-63. PubMed ID: 11649681
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Ethical issues in research relationships between universities and industry.
Rule JT; Shamoo AE
Account Res; 1997; 5(4):239-49. PubMed ID: 11656990
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Academics face abuse of rules designed to protect research.
Cowen RC
Christ Sci Monitor; 1998 Mar; ():13. PubMed ID: 11647561
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. University physician-researcher conflicts of interest: the inadequacy of current controls and proposed reform.
Maatz CT
High Technol Law J; 1992; 7():137-88. PubMed ID: 11659962
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. The laboratory as profit center.
Tenner E
Harv Mag; 1981; 83(3):15-9. PubMed ID: 11650493
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Biotechnology and the commercial use of human cells: toward an organic view of life and technology.
Martin PA; Lagod ML
Santa Clara Comput High Technol Law J; 1989 Jun; 5(2):211-61. PubMed ID: 11659674
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Principles, property rights, and profits: historical reflections on university/industry relations.
Kevles DJ
Account Res; 2001; 8(4):293-307. PubMed ID: 12481797
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Proprietary rights and the norms of science in biotechnology research.
Eisenberg RS
Yale Law J; 1987 Dec; 97(2):177-231. PubMed ID: 11660398
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. U.S. research patents: conflicts arise.
Dickson D
Nature; 1981 Dec; 294(5841):506. PubMed ID: 11643676
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Can academia adapt to biotechnology's lure?
Fox JL
Chem Eng News; 1981 Oct; 59(41):39-44. PubMed ID: 11650512
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Biotechnology, patients' rights, and the Moore case.
Howard JJ
Food Drug Cosmet Law J; 1989 Jul; 44(4):331-58. PubMed ID: 11659209
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Business and the academy.
Bok DC
Harv Mag; 1981; 83(5):23-35. PubMed ID: 11662883
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. University-industrial collaboration in research.
Lynn WR; Long FA
Technol Soc; 1982; 4(3):199-212. PubMed ID: 11650661
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Universities plan to speed sale of biotechnology.
New Sci; 1983 Mar; 97(1349):704. PubMed ID: 11655523
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Academic interest conflicts: laxity of Californian practice.
Budiansky S
Nature; 1983 Jan; 301(5896):102. PubMed ID: 11643953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Non-starters and no brainers: an outside perspective.
David EE
Account Res; 1997; 5(4):255-63. PubMed ID: 11656992
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Public-private partnerships in biomedical research: resolving conflicts arising under the Federal Technology Transfer Act of 1986.
Bulleit TN
J Law Health; 1989-1990; 4(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 11652568
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Biologists in pinstripes.
Pollack R
Sciences (New York); 1982 Oct; 22(7):35-7. PubMed ID: 11650586
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. The impact of biotechnology on patent law.
Plant DW
Technol Soc; 1983; 5(2):95-106. PubMed ID: 11650688
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The DNA disease.
Stetten D
Nature; 1982 May; 297(5864):260. PubMed ID: 11643747
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
