These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11643762)
1. Right to die (second of two parts): a set of fact sheets. Society for the Right to Die Conn Med; 1982 May; 46(5):273-8. PubMed ID: 11643762 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. In re Storar: the right to die and incompetent patients. Colabrese CA Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1982; 43(4):1087-107. PubMed ID: 11658613 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Substituted judgment in medical decision making for incompetent persons: In re Storar. Williams SE Wis L Rev; 1982; 1982(6):1173-98. PubMed ID: 11651834 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The right to die in peace: substituted consent and the mentally incompetent. Brant J Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1977; 11(4):959-73. PubMed ID: 11664849 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Therefore, choose death. Brown ML Human Rights; 1982; 10(3):38-45. PubMed ID: 11651709 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. In the matter of Mary Hier. Paulus SM Issues Law Med; 1986 Mar; 1(5):413-6. PubMed ID: 11644048 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Decisionmaking in authorizing and withholding life sustaining medical treatment: from Quinlan to Cruzan. Keilitz I; Bilzor JC; Hafemeister TL; Brown V; Dudyshyn D Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1989; 13(5):482-93. PubMed ID: 11654759 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Death with dignity laws: a plea for uniform legislation. Freamon BK Seton Hall Legis J; 1982; 5(2):105-47. PubMed ID: 11651748 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Withholding life-prolonging medical treatment from the institutionalized person--who decides? Corbett KA; Raciti RM New Engl J Prison Law; 1976; 3(1):47-83. PubMed ID: 11664738 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Deciding for the incompetent patient: identifying the role of family members. Healey JM Conn Med; 1984 Oct; 48(10):687. PubMed ID: 11644167 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Live or let die; who decides an incompetent's fate? In re Storar and In re Eichner. Bates KW Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1982; 1982(2):387-400. PubMed ID: 11655681 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. In the shadow of Karen Quinlan. Bennett SA Trial; 1976 Sep; 12(9):36-41. PubMed ID: 11664653 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Euthanasia, the right to die and privacy: observations on some recent cases. Riga PJ Linc Law Rev; 1980; 11(2):109-65. PubMed ID: 11658630 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Judicial innovation and policy re-invention: state supreme courts and the right to die. Glick HR West Polit Q; 1992; ():71-92. PubMed ID: 11652627 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The right to die. Kirven G Ky Bench Bar; 1975 Jul; 39(3):16+. PubMed ID: 11664754 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. 'Right-to-die' theory upheld in New Jersey. Rust M Am Med News; 1985 Feb; 28(5):1, 23. PubMed ID: 11653617 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Delaware Supreme Court upholds right of incompetent person to die. Ment Disabil Law Rep; 1981; 5(1):21-2. PubMed ID: 11663212 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. "Right to die" cases: a model for judicial decision-making? Webster WL N Y Law School Hum Rights Annu; 1990; 7(2):140-56. PubMed ID: 11652592 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The life support cases: myths and realities. Hartz JN Los Angel Lawyer; 1982; 5(5):18-20, 33, 52+. PubMed ID: 11653530 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The role of the family in medical decisionmaking for incompetent adult patients: a historical perspective and case analysis. Krasik EB Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1987; 48(2):539-618. PubMed ID: 11658944 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]