BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11643769)

  • 1. Social science research regulations.
    Seiler LH; Veatch RM
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1982 Apr; 12(2):45-6. PubMed ID: 11643769
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Deception research and the HHS final regulations.
    Dresser RS
    IRB; 1981 Apr; 3(4):3-4. PubMed ID: 11661944
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How general an assurance?
    Pattullo EL; Levine RJ
    IRB; 1981 May; 3(5):8-9. PubMed ID: 11649369
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Protection of human subjects.
    United States
    Code Fed Regul Shipping; 1982 Oct; Part 46, Sections 46.101 to 46.306():. PubMed ID: 11660819
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Research involving children: an interpretation of the new regulations.
    Levine RJ
    IRB; 1983; 5(4):1-5. PubMed ID: 11649521
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. FDA revises informed consent regulations for emergency research.
    Menasché A; Levine RJ
    IRB; 1995; 17(5-6):19-22. PubMed ID: 11653359
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. New human subject regulations would change certain IRB reviews.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 1998 Jul; 13(7):1-2. PubMed ID: 11656820
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Changing federal regulation of IRBs, Part III: social research and the proposed DHEW regulations.
    Gray BH
    IRB; 1980 Jan; 2(1):1-5+. PubMed ID: 11661793
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Why HHS should reconsider its proposed exemption for social policy experiments.
    Abram MB;
    IRB; 1982 May; 4(5):10-2. PubMed ID: 11649408
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Institutional review boards not paying enough attention to active research projects.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 1998 Nov; 13(11):1-2. PubMed ID: 11657741
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Federal report says protection of human subjects is threatened by numerous factors.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 1996 May; 11(5):1-3. PubMed ID: 11654438
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. New confidentiality duties for institutional review boards.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2000 Feb; 15(2):1-2. PubMed ID: 11660761
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hospital failed on human research policy.
    Science; 1998 Nov; 282(5391):1035. PubMed ID: 11645114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An overview of FDA, IRBs and regulations.
    Petricciani JC
    IRB; 1981 Dec; 3(10):1-3, 11. PubMed ID: 11649413
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Regulating human gene therapy.
    Areen J
    West VA Law Rev; 1985; 88(2):153-71. PubMed ID: 11655150
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Revising human subjects policy: an example of consensual decision-making.
    Cohen JM; Hedberg WB
    J Soc Res Adm; 1984; 15(4):29-34. PubMed ID: 11649707
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The history of institutional review boards.
    Sherman M; Van Vleet JD
    Regul Aff J; 1991; 3():615-27. PubMed ID: 11651491
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An even safer safety net.
    Prentice E
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1997; 27(3):46. PubMed ID: 11644996
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Protection of human subjects in research projects.
    Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1980 Apr; 126(68):S4365-73. PubMed ID: 11661858
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The federal policy for the protection of human subjects.
    Porter JP
    IRB; 1991; 13(5):8-9. PubMed ID: 11651250
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.