258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11643771)
1. NIH approves the consent for Baby Fae, or does it?
Levine C
Hastings Cent Rep; 1985 Apr; 15(2):2. PubMed ID: 11643771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The NIH report of its review of the Baby Fae case.
Dommel FW;
IRB; 1986; 8(2):1-4. PubMed ID: 11649748
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Lack of scrutiny fueled Baby Fae controversy.
Russell C
Washington Post; 1984 Nov; ():A15. PubMed ID: 11646400
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Transplant of baboon heart conformed to safety rules.
Mathews J
Washington Post; 1985 Mar; ():A4. PubMed ID: 11647786
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Baby Fae.
Washington Post; 1984 Nov; ():A14. PubMed ID: 11646414
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The concept of the IRB and bureaucratic reality: an exchange of letters.
van Eys J; Levine RJ
IRB; 1984; 6(4):8-10. PubMed ID: 11649563
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Special informed consent requirements are included in protocol review procedures.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1995 Jul; 10(7):1-2. PubMed ID: 11654274
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Informed consent: the FDA's perspective.
Bagley G
Food Drug Law J; 1993; 48(2):181-6. PubMed ID: 11653141
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Human experimentation: the review process in practice.
Cowan DH
Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1975; 25(3):533-64. PubMed ID: 11661165
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. 'Baby Fae'--what does she mean to us?
Preston TA
Med World News; 1984 Nov; 25(22):84. PubMed ID: 11658478
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Baby Fae: the "anything goes" school of human experimentation.
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1985 Feb; 15(1):15-7. PubMed ID: 3884551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The subject is Baby Fae.
Hastings Cent Rep; 1985 Feb; 15(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 3884552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Beyond localism: a proposal for a National Research Review Board.
Levine C; Caplan AL
IRB; 1986; 8(2):7-9. PubMed ID: 11649751
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Annual review: observed deficiencies and suggested corrections.
Adams MS; Conrad DA
IRB; 1996; 18(6):1-4. PubMed ID: 11654743
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Baby Fae: the ethics of medical adventurism.
Preston TA
Washington Post; 1984 Nov; ():D7. PubMed ID: 11647783
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Proposed requirements for informed consent go beyond current federal regulations.
Hum Res Rep; 1994 Jul; 9(7):1-3. PubMed ID: 11659879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Can teenagers participate in research without parental consent?
Holder AR; Veatch RM
IRB; 1981 Feb; 3(2):5-8. PubMed ID: 11662830
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The regulation of human experimentation in the United States--a personal odyssey.
Katz J
IRB; 1987; 9(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 11649890
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. More rejection crises likely for Baby Fae.
Mathews J
Washington Post; 1984 Nov; ():A10. PubMed ID: 11647785
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Informed consent process and document is criticized in court.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1994 Dec; 9(12):4-5. PubMed ID: 11654162
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
