192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11643844)
21. Project Release v. Prevost.
U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Fed Report; 1983 Oct; 722():960-81. PubMed ID: 11648484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Institutionalizing the rights of mental patients: committing the legislature.
Morris GH
Calif Law Rev; 1974 May; 62(3):957-1024. PubMed ID: 11663464
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. The 1983 revision of the Texas mental health code.
Dix GE
St Marys Law J; 1984; 16(1):41-153. PubMed ID: 11658786
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. The Minnesota Commitment Act of 1982: summary and analysis.
Janus ES; Wolfson RM
Hamline Law Rev; 1983 Feb; 6(1):41-94. PubMed ID: 11658497
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. APA's model law: a commitment code by and for psychiatrists.
Wexler DB
Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1985 Sep; 36(9):981-3. PubMed ID: 4065859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Constitutional requirements in the commitment of the mentally ill in the U.S.A.: rights to liberty and therapy.
Flaschner FN
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 1974; 18(3):283-301. PubMed ID: 11664409
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Project Release v. Prevost.
U.S. District Court, E.D. New York
Fed Suppl; 1982 Nov; 551():1298-310. PubMed ID: 11648548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Toward a right to treatment for civilly committed mental patients.
Belzer I
UMKC Law Rev; 1975; 44(1):23-48. PubMed ID: 11664543
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. O'Connor v. Donaldson. 26 Jun 1975.
U.S. Supreme Court
U S Rep U S Supreme Court; 1975; 422():563-89. PubMed ID: 12038358
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Constitutionally guaranteed rights of the mentally ill.
Cazalas M
South Univ Law Rev; 1975; 2(1):9-38. PubMed ID: 12083089
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Compelling treatment in the community: distorted doctrines and violated values.
Schwartz SJ; Costanzo CE
Loyola Los Angel Law Rev; 1987 Jun; 20(4):1329-429. PubMed ID: 11658983
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Medicating committed psychiatric patients over their objections: balancing patients' interests and quality of mental health care.
Hacker G
Rutgers Law J; 1983; 14(3):685-739. PubMed ID: 11658759
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Observations on the Mental Health Act 1983.
Hamilton JR
Int J Law Psychiatry; 1983; 6(3-4):371-80. PubMed ID: 11658608
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Legal problems involved in implementing the right to treatment.
Morris GH
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1973 Jan; 1(1):1-37. PubMed ID: 11664496
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Revising Pennsylvania's involuntary civil commitment statute.
Vater JA
Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1975; 37(1):180-93. PubMed ID: 11664513
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Guidelines for involuntary civil commitment.
National Center for State Courts' Institute on Mental Disability and the Law
Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1986; 10(5):409-514. PubMed ID: 11659039
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Senate Bill 26--mental patients' bill of rights.
Lynch FE; Neustrom PW
Washburn Law J; 1976; 16(1):149-60. PubMed ID: 11664695
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. The adversary system in civil commitment of the mentally ill: does it exist, and does it work?
Miller RD; Fiddleman PB
J Psychiatry Law; 1981; 9(4):403-21. PubMed ID: 11658291
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Involuntary commitment of the mentally ill.
Troland MB
Mont Law Rev; 1977; 38(2):307-25. PubMed ID: 11664835
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. APA's model law: hurting the people it seeks to help.
Rubenstein LS
Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1985 Sep; 36(9):968-72. PubMed ID: 4065856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
