148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11643871)
1. The substituted judgment approach: its difficulties and paradoxes in mental health settings.
Gutheil TG; Appelbaum PS
Law Med Health Care; 1985 Apr; 13(2):61-4. PubMed ID: 11643871
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The presumption for treatment: has it been justified?
Rhoden NK
Law Med Health Care; 1985 Apr; 13(2):65-7. PubMed ID: 11643872
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. On the right of "nondangerous" incompetent patients to leave psychiatric units against medical advice.
DeGrazia D
Contemp Philos; 1992 Sep; 14(5):1-5. PubMed ID: 11660299
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Ulysses contracts.
Lavin M
J Appl Philos; 1986 Mar; 3(1):89-101. PubMed ID: 11658829
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Bound to freedom: the Ulysses contract and the psychiatric will.
Macklin A
Univ Tor Fac Law Rev; 1987; 45(1):37-68. PubMed ID: 11659143
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Mental health -- closing the loophole in Massachusetts' substituted judgment treatment order statutes -- Guardianship of Weedon, 409 Mass. 196, 565 N.E.2d 432 (1991).
Patterson LA
Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1991; 25(3):883-94. PubMed ID: 11659707
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Medical decisionmaking for incompetent persons: the Massachusetts substituted judgment model.
Dunphy SM; Cross JH
West New Engl Law Rev; 1987; 9(1):153-67. PubMed ID: 11649910
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Patient consent in psychotropic drug treatment.
Garrison A
Princet J Bioeth; 1999; 2(1):33-46. PubMed ID: 11658141
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Substituted judgment: the parens patriae justification for involuntary treatment of the mentally ill.
Wesson M
J Psychiatry Law; 1980; 8(2):147-65. PubMed ID: 11665180
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Advance directive instruments for those with mental illness.
Winick BJ
Univ Miami Law Rev; 1996 Oct; 51(1):57-95. PubMed ID: 11660621
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Hospitalized psychiatric patients' resistance to routine medical care.
Eilers R
Adm Policy Ment Health; 1994 May; 21(5):407-15. PubMed ID: 11660614
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A proposal for the use of advance directives in the treatment of incompetent mentally ill persons.
Brock DW
Bioethics; 1993 Apr; 7(2-3):247-56. PubMed ID: 11651538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An alternative definition of competence.
Culver CM; Gert B; Abernethy V
Am J Psychiatry; 1984 Sep; 141(9):1136-7. PubMed ID: 11644152
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Toward a pure best interests model of proxy decision making for incompetent psychiatric patients.
McCubbin M; Weisstub DN
Int J Law Psychiatry; 1998; 21(1):1-30. PubMed ID: 9526712
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Informed consent and the voluntary psychiatric patient.
Mrazek ML
Leg Med Q; 1996; 20(Pt.4):13-20. PubMed ID: 11660714
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Rights within the therapeutic relationship.
King P
J Law Health; 1991-1992; 6(1):31-60. PubMed ID: 11659514
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Choosing to refuse: patients' rights and psychotropic medication.
Radden J
Bioethics; 1988 Apr; 2(2):83-102. PubMed ID: 11650056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Surrogate consent.
Richards N
Public Aff Q; 1992 Apr; 6(2):227-43. PubMed ID: 11652630
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Falling off the vine: legal fictions and the doctrine of substituted judgment.
Harmon L
Yale Law J; 1990 Oct; 100(1):1-71. PubMed ID: 11659389
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Medical, ethical and legal considerations of electroconvulsive therapy.
MacDonald RP
Osgoode Hall Law J; 1984; 22(4):683-710. PubMed ID: 11658852
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
