These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11643876)

  • 1. 1982 Abortion Control Act now in court test.
    Jones KB
    Pa Med; 1982 Dec; 85(12):19-20. PubMed ID: 11643876
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A review of state abortion laws enacted since January 1973.
    Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1974 Oct; 3(5):88-93. PubMed ID: 11664324
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Roe to Casey: a survey of abortion law.
    Pirner RK; Williams LB
    Washburn Law J; 1993; 32(2):166-89. PubMed ID: 11659798
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Enforcement of state abortion statutes after Roe: a state-by-state analysis.
    Linton PB
    Univ Detroit Law Rev; 1990; 67(2):157-259. PubMed ID: 11659261
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Abortions for minors after Bellotti II: an analysis of state law and a proposal.
    Lozano GD
    St Marys Law J; 1980; 11(4):946-97. PubMed ID: 11658462
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A decade of cementing the mosaic of Roe v. Wade: is the composite a message to leave abortion alone?
    Kudner KE
    Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1984; 15(2):681-753. PubMed ID: 11649780
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The viability of the trimester approach.
    Calder KA
    Univ Baltimore Law Rev; 1984; 13(2):322-45. PubMed ID: 11658808
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Constitutional law: further guidelines for abortion legislation.
    Oklahoma Law Rev; 1976; 29(3):785-8. PubMed ID: 11664737
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The trimester approach: how long can the legal fiction last?
    Casurella JG; Schrock CT
    Mercer Law Rev; 1984; 35(4):891-913. PubMed ID: 11658750
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perspectives on the abortion decision.
    Noble CF
    N M Law Rev; 1978 Winter 1978; 9(1):175-86. PubMed ID: 11665182
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Privacy II: state attempts to regulate abortion.
    Prall S
    Annu Surv Am Law; 1988; 1(2):385-427. PubMed ID: 11652657
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. S.J. Res. 110: Human Life Federalism Amendment.
    Hatch OG
    Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1981 Sep; 127(131):S10194-8. PubMed ID: 11658572
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Appeals court upholds limits for abortions.
    Hinds Md
    N Y Times Web; 1991 Oct; ():A1, A16. PubMed ID: 11647901
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Supreme Court says spouse, parent can't block abortion.
    Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1976 Aug; 5(4):53-7. PubMed ID: 11664665
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The abortion decision and evolving limits on state intervention.
    MacDougal D; Nasser WP
    Haw Bar J; 1975; 11():51-72. PubMed ID: 11664576
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Termination of pregnancies.
    Florida
    Wests Fla Statut Annot Fla; 1983; Sections 390.001 to 390.025 effective 1 Oct 1980():. PubMed ID: 12041438
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A review of state abortion laws enacted since January 1973.
    Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1975 Dec; 4(6):108-13. PubMed ID: 11664490
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Abortion and Sterilization Act 2 of 1975: a third opinion (part II).
    Bertrand AR
    S Afr Tydskr Strafr Kriminol; 1978 Nov; 2(3):263-77. PubMed ID: 12091956
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Missouri loses latest round in battle over permissible abortion regulations.
    Baldwin ML
    UMKC Law Rev; 1982; 50(3):320-39. PubMed ID: 11658633
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey: constitutional principles and political turbulence.
    Bigel AI
    Univ Dayton Law Rev; 1993; 18(3):733-62. PubMed ID: 11659777
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.