235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11643878)
1. Mental Health Act revision.
Ney PG
N Z Med J; 1985 Apr; 98(777):304. PubMed ID: 11643878
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Civil commitment of the mentally ill in California: the Lanterman-Petris-Short Act.
Hart MA
Loyola Los Angel Law Rev; 1974 Feb; 7(1):93-136. PubMed ID: 11664312
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Law and the mentally ill.
Tanay E
Wayne Law Rev; 1976 Mar; 22(3):781-813. PubMed ID: 11664634
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Involuntary civil commitment: the right to treatment and the right to refuse treatment.
Roth LH
Psychiatr Ann; 1977 May; 7(5):50-51+. PubMed ID: 11664817
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Developments in the law: civil commitment of the mentally ill.
Harv Law Rev; 1974 Apr; 87(6):1190-406. PubMed ID: 11664523
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A model state law on civil commitment of the mentally ill.
Stromberg CD; Stone AA
Harvard J Legis; 1983; 20(2):275-396. PubMed ID: 11658832
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Donaldson, dangerousness, and the right to treatment.
Grant GM
Hastings Constit Law Q; 1976; 3(2):599-627. PubMed ID: 11664729
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. In search of a sane commitment statute.
Treffert DA; Krajeck RW
Psychiatr Ann; 1976 Jun; 6(6):56-57+. PubMed ID: 11662296
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Law of 2 July 1992 of the Russian Federation on psychiatric care and the safeguarding of citizens' rights in the dispensing of such care.
Russian Federation
Int Dig Health Legis; 1993; 44(2):267-81. PubMed ID: 11655198
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Missouri's new mental health act: the problems with progress.
Staulcup VH
Wash Univ Law Q; 1979; 1979(1):209-33. PubMed ID: 11665135
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Treating the mentally disordered offender: society's uncertain, conflicted, and changing views.
Hafemeister TL; Petrila J
Fla State Univ Law Rev; 1994; 21(3):729-871. PubMed ID: 11660258
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Judicially-ordered involuntary treatment of the mentally ill.
Sullivan JL
J Mo Bar; 1975 Jun; 31():254-8. PubMed ID: 11664534
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The Minnesota Commitment Act of 1982: summary and analysis.
Janus ES; Wolfson RM
Hamline Law Rev; 1983 Feb; 6(1):41-94. PubMed ID: 11658497
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Post-Parham remedies: the involuntary commitment of minors in Virginia after Parham v. J.R.
Spaulding WJ
Univ Richmond Law Rev; 1979; 13(4):695-741. PubMed ID: 11665159
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Civil commitment in Alabama.
Segall RD
Ala Law Rev; 1977; 26(1):215-71. PubMed ID: 11664721
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Protecting the rights of the mentally ill.
Shwed HJ
Am Bar Assoc J; 1978 Apr; 64():564-7. PubMed ID: 11665016
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Working in the "cuckoo's nest": an essay on recent changes in mental health law and the changing role of psychiatrists in relation to patient and society.
Arons BS
Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1977; 9(1):73-93. PubMed ID: 11664909
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Civil rights and the mentally ill: revolution in bedlam.
Offir CW
Psychol Today; 1974 Oct; 8(5):60-62+. PubMed ID: 11664431
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Changes in the law have improved treatment of the mentally ill.
Sadoff RL
Hospitals; 1981 May; 55(9):61-4. PubMed ID: 7216207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pennsylvania's new Mental Health Procedures Act: due process and the right to treatment for the mentally ill.
Lundeen PA
Dickinson Law Rev; 1977; 81(3):627-47. PubMed ID: 11664828
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
