These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
484 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11643913)
1. If it's research, it must be reviewed: an NIH reprimand. Levine C Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Feb; 16(1):2-3. PubMed ID: 11643913 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Government guinea pigs. Rothman DJ N Y Times Web; 1994 Jan; ():E21. PubMed ID: 11646304 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The regulation of human experimentation in the United States--a personal odyssey. Katz J IRB; 1987; 9(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 11649890 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Institutional review boards in the university setting: review of pharmaceutical testing protocols, informed consent and ethical concerns. Kobasic DM J Coll Univ Law; 1988; 15(2):185-216. PubMed ID: 11659168 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Trends in the social control of medical and psychiatric research. Benson PR; Roth LH Law Ment Health; 1988; 4():1-47. PubMed ID: 11655151 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. In response: speaking truth to historiography. Faden R; Guttman D Med Humanit Rev; 1997; 11(2):37-43. PubMed ID: 11645854 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The quality of mercy. Crigger BJ Hastings Cent Rep; 1993; 23(3):3. PubMed ID: 11643129 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Agency faults a U.C.L.A. study for suffering of mental patients. Hilts PJ N Y Times Web; 1994 Mar; ():A1, B10. PubMed ID: 11647969 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Ethics lapses at Duke halt dozens of human experiments. Hilts PJ; Stolberg SG N Y Times Web; 1999 May; ():A26. PubMed ID: 11648115 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. An overview of legal controls on human experimentation and the regulatory implications of taking Professor Katz seriously. Goldner JA St Louis Univ Law J; 1993; 38(1):63-134. PubMed ID: 11656325 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. In tests on people, who watches the watchers? Hilts PJ N Y Times Web; 1999 May; ():F1, F4. PubMed ID: 11648129 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. An overview of FDA, IRBs and regulations. Petricciani JC IRB; 1981 Dec; 3(10):1-3, 11. PubMed ID: 11649413 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Obtaining "informed consent": controversy over radiation tests focuses attention on rules for human subjects. Wheeler DL Chron High Educ; 1994 Jan; 40():8-9, 16. PubMed ID: 11658067 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Medical ethics in the dock. N Y Times Web; 1994 Mar; ():A16. PubMed ID: 11647023 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Special informed consent requirements are included in protocol review procedures. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 1995 Jul; 10(7):1-2. PubMed ID: 11654274 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. US researchers fail to get informed consent. Roberts J BMJ; 1994 Mar; 308(6931):739. PubMed ID: 11644521 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Human experimentation: the review process in practice. Cowan DH Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1975; 25(3):533-64. PubMed ID: 11661165 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The pursuit of the artificial heart. Bernstein BJ Med Herit; 1986; 2(2):80-150. PubMed ID: 11649776 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]