84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11643985)
1. The fetus and the Fourteenth.
Burtchaell JT; Doerflinger R; Segers M
Hastings Cent Rep; 1983 Feb; 13(1):35-6. PubMed ID: 11643985
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Personhood, abortion and the law.
Verkamp BJ
America (NY); 1982 Jan; 146(3):46-8. PubMed ID: 11658287
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Abortion: a misplaced debate.
Brockway AR
Engage Soc Action; 1974 Feb; 2(2):33-47. PubMed ID: 11663497
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Can Congress create people?
Buckley WF; Galebach SH; Bork R; Pilpel H
Hum Life Rev; 1981; 7(3):87-108. PubMed ID: 11655601
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The fetus under Section 1983: still struggling for recognition.
Czepiga PT
Syracuse Law Rev; 1983; 34(4):1029-65. PubMed ID: 11655745
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Hyde and go seek: a response to Representative Hyde.
Pilpel HF
NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1982; 27(4):1101-23. PubMed ID: 11651774
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. On the legal status of the proposition that "life begins at conception.
Rubenfeld J
Stanford Law Rev; 1991 Feb; 43(3):599-635. PubMed ID: 11645689
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The constitutionality of the Human Life Bill.
Ruf BA
Wash Univ Law Q; 1983; 61(1):219-52. PubMed ID: 11655816
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Abortion, personhood, and privacy in Texas.
Johnson A
Tex Law Rev; 1990 Jun; 68(7):1521-44. PubMed ID: 11656019
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The decline of personhood.
Wauck J
Hum Life Rev; 1988; 14(1):51-70. PubMed ID: 11655918
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The "right" to an abortion, the scope of Fourteenth Amendment "personhood," and the Supreme Court's birth requirement.
Gorby JD
South Ill Univ Law J; 1979; 1979(1):1-36. PubMed ID: 12083082
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A decision-theoretic reconstruction of Roe v. Wade.
Lockhart T
Public Aff Q; 1991 Jul; 5(3):243-58. PubMed ID: 11656064
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of the abortion decisions upon the father's role.
Witherspoon JP
Jurist; 1975; 35(1):32-65. PubMed ID: 11664577
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. byrn and Roe: the threshold question and juridical review.
Riga PJ
Cathol Lawyer; 1978; 23(4):309-31. PubMed ID: 11664059
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Abortion and the Constitution: the need for a life-protective amendment.
Destro RA
Calif Law Rev; 1975 Sep; 63(5):1250-351. PubMed ID: 11663611
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The constitutional validity of abortion legislation: a comparative note.
Glenn HP
McGill Law J; 1975; 21(4):673-84. PubMed ID: 11663622
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Roe v. Wade--the abortion decision--an analysis and its implications.
Riggs T
San Diego Law Rev; 1973 Jun; 10(4):844-56. PubMed ID: 11661026
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. "A new Constitutional right": the Supreme Court and abortion.
De Borst J
Reform J; 1973 Apr; 23(4):7-10. PubMed ID: 11663641
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Abortion and the Hatch Amendment.
Bryce E
America (NY); 1982 Mar; 146(9):166-8. PubMed ID: 11658309
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Abortion and degrees of personhood: understanding why the abortion problem (and the animal rights problem) are irresolvable.
Li HL
Public Aff Q; 1997 Jan; 11(1):1-19. PubMed ID: 11656703
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
