BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11644034)

  • 1. Fraud in science.
    S Afr Med J; 1983 Aug; 64(6):190-1. PubMed ID: 11644034
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fraud and misrepresentation in research--whose rights?
    Schmaus W; Wigodsky HS
    IRB; 1984; 6(5):10-1. PubMed ID: 11650663
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Science police.
    Dolnick E
    Discover; 1994 Feb; 15(2):56-63. PubMed ID: 11653089
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Trouble in the laboratory: probing the science of a controversial paper.
    Fackelmann KA
    Sci News; 1990 Mar; 137(13):200-203, 205. PubMed ID: 11650334
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Congressmen investigate scientific fraud.
    Perspectives Prof; 1981; 1(3-4):10-2. PubMed ID: 11649375
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fraud in research, 1986-1992: an annotated bibliography.
    Anderson J
    J Infor Ethics; 1994; 3(2):64-89. PubMed ID: 11656481
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Policing fraud and deceit: the legal aspects of misconduct in scientific inquiry.
    Protti M
    J Infor Ethics; 1996; 5(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 11653390
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. New charges hit Illmensee.
    MacKenzie D
    New Sci; 1984 May; 102(1412):3-4. PubMed ID: 11655608
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Nobelist apologizes for defending research paper with faulty data.
    Hilts PJ
    N Y Times Web; 1991 May; ():1, 7. PubMed ID: 11646854
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Too good to be true.
    Colt GH
    Harv Mag; 1983; 85(6):22-28, 54. PubMed ID: 11649472
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The scientific community perspective on research integrity.
    Teich AH
    Account Res; 1993; 3(2-3):117-22. PubMed ID: 11652291
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. "I am innocent," embattled biologist says.
    Hilts PJ
    N Y Times Web; 1991 Jun; ():C1, C10. PubMed ID: 11646863
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of federal regulations in assuring research integrity.
    Friedman PJ
    Account Res; 1993; 3(2-3):111-6. PubMed ID: 11652290
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Science friction.
    Gladwell M
    Washington Post; 1992 Dec; ():18-21, 49-51. PubMed ID: 11646256
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Scientific misconduct in academia: a survey and analysis of applicable law.
    Sise CB
    San Diego Law Rev; 1991; 28(2):401-28. PubMed ID: 11651628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The assault on David Baltimore.
    Kevles DJ
    New Yorker; 1996 May; 72(13):94-98, 100-104, 106-109. PubMed ID: 11654450
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fraud and sloppiness in science.
    Schmaus W
    Perspectives Prof; 1981; 1(3-4):1-4. PubMed ID: 11649374
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. When good scientists turn bad.
    Roman MB
    Discover; 1988 Apr; 9(4):50-55, 57-58. PubMed ID: 11653808
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Office of Scientific Integrity.
    Hamilton DP
    Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 1992 Jun; 2(2):171-5. PubMed ID: 11645744
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fraud and misrepresentation in research--whose responsibility?
    Wigodsky HS
    IRB; 1984; 6(2):1-5. PubMed ID: 11649536
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.