357 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11644064)
1. Brophy v. New England Sinai Hospital.
Nimz MM
Issues Law Med; 1986 Nov; 2(3):221-34. PubMed ID: 11644064
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Brophy v. New England Sinai Hospital, Inc.
Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court, Norfolk
North East Rep Second Ser; 1986 Sep; 497():626-46. PubMed ID: 12041216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Nancy Cruzan case.
McCormick RA
Midwest Med Ethics; 1989; 5(1-2):2-31. PubMed ID: 12091960
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The search for objectivity in applying the substituted judgment rule in medical care cases.
King JC
Boston Bar J; 1993; 37(17):10-12, 14. PubMed ID: 11652649
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A legal test of the right to die.
Malcolm AH
N Y Times Web; 1985 May; ():9. PubMed ID: 11646513
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. When should the state step aside? Terminating treatment for PVS victims.
Harvey JC; Quinn KP; Johnson SH
Commonweal; 1990 May; 117(9):286-94. PubMed ID: 11652558
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The right to death.
Dworkin R
New York Rev Books; 1991 Jan; ():14-7. PubMed ID: 11653244
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Brophy v. New England Sinai Hospital.
Paulus SM
Issues Law Med; 1986 Jan; 1(4):331-42. PubMed ID: 11651817
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Medical decisionmaking for incompetent persons: the Massachusetts substituted judgment model.
Dunphy SM; Cross JH
West New Engl Law Rev; 1987; 9(1):153-67. PubMed ID: 11649910
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Cruzan and the right to die: a perspective on privacy interests.
Watson DE
Mercer Law Rev; 1991; 42(3):1147-81. PubMed ID: 11651439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. DeGrella v. Elston: Kentucky Supreme Court rules on an incompetent's right to die.
Mehrle JP
North KY Law Rev; 1994; 21(2):449-74. PubMed ID: 11653010
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Cruzan v. Harmon and the dangerous claim that others can exercise an incapacitated patient's right to die.
Ellman IM
Jurimetrics; 1989; 29(4):389-401. PubMed ID: 11652559
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Cruzan and the constitutional status of nontreatment decisions for incompetent patients.
Robertson JA
Georgia Law Rev; 1991; 25(5):1139-202. PubMed ID: 11652580
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Rasmussen v. Fleming.
Pollard CT
Issues Law Med; 1987; 3(3):297-310. PubMed ID: 11644117
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Paul E. Brophy is dead at 49; tested rule on right to die.
N Y Times Web; 1986 Oct; ():B9. PubMed ID: 11646531
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. In re Storar: the right to die and incompetent patients.
Colabrese CA
Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1982; 43(4):1087-107. PubMed ID: 11658613
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The Death-Prolonging Procedures Act and refusal of treatment in Missouri.
Johnson SH
St Louis Univ Law J; 1986; 30(3):805-32. PubMed ID: 11649879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Someone make up my mind: the troubling right to die issues presented by incompetent patients with no prior expression of a treatment preference.
Richard SM
Notre Dame Law Rev; 1989; 64(3):394-421. PubMed ID: 11659243
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Gray v. Romeo.
Di Somma AV
Issues Law Med; 1989; 4(4):535-40. PubMed ID: 11644379
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. From Quinlan to Cruzan: patterns in the fabric of US "right-to-die" case law.
Allsopp ME
Humane Med; 1992 Apr; 8(2):122-31. PubMed ID: 11651322
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
