143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11644068)
21. The right of privacy and the terminally-ill patient: establishing the "right-to-die".
McGinley T
Mercer Law Rev; 1980; 31(2):603-15. PubMed ID: 11661875
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Medico-legal aspects of the 'right to die' legislation in Australia.
Mendelson D
Melb Univ Law Rev; 1993 Jun; 19(1):112-52. PubMed ID: 11654112
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. The Sue Rodriguez decision: concerns of a primary care physician.
Pankratz HR
Humane Med; 1995 Jan; 11(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 11654982
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Physician assisted suicide: the abortion of the nineties.
Morris BK
Law Psychol Rev; 1996; 20():215-29. PubMed ID: 11656624
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. In re Requena.
New Jersey. Superior Court, Chancery Division, Morris County
Atl Report; 1986 Sep; 517():886-93. PubMed ID: 11648300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. In re Storar: the right to die and incompetent patients.
Colabrese CA
Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1982; 43(4):1087-107. PubMed ID: 11658613
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Rejection of extraordinary medical care by a terminal patient: a proposed living will statute.
Freeman J
Iowa Law Rev; 1979 Mar; 64(3):573-658. PubMed ID: 11665074
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. A time to be born and a time to die: a pregnant woman's right to die with dignity.
Mulholland KA
Indiana Law Rev; 1987; 20(4):859-78. PubMed ID: 11652514
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Self-directed death, euthanasia, and the termination of life-support: reasonable decisions to die.
Neeley GS
Campbell Law Rev; 1994; 16(2):205-29. PubMed ID: 11660027
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Bouvia v. Superior Court: the death option.
Voboril LA
Pac Law J; 1987 Apr; 18(3):1029-53. PubMed ID: 11651883
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. The legal aspects of the right to die: before and after the Quinlan decision.
Becker D; Fleming R; Overstreet R
KY Law J; 1977; 65(4):823-79. PubMed ID: 11661533
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. The legal logic of euthanasia.
Uhlmann MM
First Things; 1996; 64():39-43. PubMed ID: 11654467
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Complaint for declaratory relief in Rodas case.
Issues Law Med; 1987 May; 2(6):499-501. PubMed ID: 11644076
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Legislating the right to die in peace.
Schafer A
Humane Med; 1985 Mar; 1(1):34-6. PubMed ID: 11649675
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Against assisted suicide -- even a very limited form.
Kamisar Y
Univ Detroit Mercy Law Rev; 1995; 72(4):735-69. PubMed ID: 11654369
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. In re Jane Doe.
Pennsylvania. Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
Pa Dist Cty Rep; 1987 Aug; 45():371-90. PubMed ID: 12085890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The limits of proxy decisionmaking for incompetents.
Buchanan AE
UCLA Law Rev; 1981; 29(2):386-408. PubMed ID: 11660397
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. The Constitution and the right to die.
Drinan RF
America (NY); 1996 Apr; 174(13):6-7. PubMed ID: 11660239
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Damage actions for nonconsensual life-sustaining medical treatment.
Dooling RP
St Louis Univ Law J; 1986; 30(3):895-918. PubMed ID: 11649881
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The assault on privacy in healthcare decisionmaking.
Rich BA
Denver Univ Law Rev; 1991; 68(1):1-55. PubMed ID: 11651237
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
