216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11644071)
1. Rodas v. ErkenBrack.
Kirkpatrick GA
Issues Law Med; 1987 May; 2(6):481-4. PubMed ID: 11644071
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Complaint for declaratory relief in Rodas case.
Issues Law Med; 1987 May; 2(6):499-501. PubMed ID: 11644076
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. In re Rodas.
Kirkpatrick GA
Issues Law Med; 1987 May; 2(6):471-80. PubMed ID: 11644070
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Dee Ross v. Hilltop Rehabilitation Hospital.
Di Somma AV
Issues Law Med; 1988; 4(2):209-14. PubMed ID: 11644322
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Ross v. Hilltop Rehabilitation Hospital.
U.S. District Court, D. Colorado
Fed Suppl; 1987 Dec; 676():1528-44. PubMed ID: 11648243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Euthanasia: the new family planning, part II.
Marker RL
Int Rev Nat Fam Plann; 1987; 11(2):95-131. PubMed ID: 11649868
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The "living will": the right to death with dignity?
Strand JG
Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1976; 26(2):485-526. PubMed ID: 11661320
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. HIV disease: criminal and civil liability for assisted suicide.
McCoy AG
Gold Gate Univ Law Rev; 1991; 21(1):437-85. PubMed ID: 11659852
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Prisoner's right to refuse treatment outweighs physician's duty to treat.
Drescher GP
J Law Med Ethics; 1993; 21(3-4):400-1. PubMed ID: 11654964
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Patient allowed to end treatment.
N Y Times Web; 1987 Jan; ():B9. PubMed ID: 11646543
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of incarceration on the right to die.
Jamieson SM
N Engl J Crim Civ Confin; 1985; 11(2):395-419. PubMed ID: 11650188
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Euthanasia, the right to die and privacy: observations on some recent cases.
Riga PJ
Linc Law Rev; 1980; 11(2):109-65. PubMed ID: 11658630
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The physician's criminal liability for the practice of euthanasia.
Foreman P
Bayl Law Rev; 1975; 27(1):54-61. PubMed ID: 11660886
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Bouvia v. Superior Court: the death option.
Voboril LA
Pac Law J; 1987 Apr; 18(3):1029-53. PubMed ID: 11651883
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The right to die: an exercise of informed consent, not an extension of the constitutional right to privacy.
Lyon EA
Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1990; 58(4):1367-95. PubMed ID: 11659504
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The constitutional right to suicide, the quality of life, and the "slippery slope": an explicit reply to lingering concerns.
Neeley GS
Akron Law Rev; 1994; 28(1):53-76. PubMed ID: 11660026
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Euthanasia: a historical overview.
Marker RL; Stanton JR; Recznik ME; Fournier KA
Md J Contemp Leg Issues; 1991; 2(2):257-98. PubMed ID: 11651211
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Ethical problems in living will legislation.
Hughes R
J Relig Aging; 1988; 5(1-2):35-50. PubMed ID: 11652837
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Mercy killing, euthanasia and aiding and abetting suicide, etc., under Danish law.
Greve V
Scand Stud Law; 1981; 25():91-107. PubMed ID: 11651903
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Georgia man asks to turn off life-supporting ventilator.
Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Atlanta (Georgia)
Origins; 1989 Sep; 19(17):273, 275-279. PubMed ID: 11651968
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]