205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11644092)
1. In re Bayer.
Kirkpatrick GA
Issues Law Med; 1987; 3(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 11644092
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. In re Bayer.
Di Somma AV
Issues Law Med; 1988; 4(1):119-21. PubMed ID: 11644471
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. In re Drabick.
Di Somma AV
Issues Law Med; 1989; 4(4):519-24. PubMed ID: 11644377
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. In re Estate of Virginia T. Prange.
Di Somma AV
Issues Law Med; 1988; 4(1):113-8. PubMed ID: 11644470
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Rasmussen v. Fleming.
Pollard CT
Issues Law Med; 1987; 3(3):297-310. PubMed ID: 11644117
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. In re Zahn.
Kirkpatrick GA
Issues Law Med; 1987 May; 2(6):485. PubMed ID: 11644072
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Delio v. Westchester County Medical Center.
Kirkpatrick GA
Issues Law Med; 1988; 4(2):215-23. PubMed ID: 11644323
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Therefore, choose death.
Brown ML
Human Rights; 1982; 10(3):38-45. PubMed ID: 11651709
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Constitutionalizing the "right to die".
Mayo TW
MD Law Rev; 1990; 49(1):103-55. PubMed ID: 11656023
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Privacy I: surrogate decision making for the terminally ill.
Eisenberg KG
Annu Surv Am Law; 1988; 1(2):353-84. PubMed ID: 11652656
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Rasmussen v. Fleming.
Paulus SM
Issues Law Med; 1986 Nov; 2(3):211-6. PubMed ID: 11644062
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. John F. Kennedy Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. Bludworth.
Paulus SM
Issues Law Med; 1985 Sep; 1(2):163-6. PubMed ID: 11643875
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Deciding for the incompetent patient: identifying the role of family members.
Healey JM
Conn Med; 1984 Oct; 48(10):687. PubMed ID: 11644167
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Coming to terms with death: the Cruzan case.
Martyn SR; Bourguignon HJ
Hastings Law J; 1991 Mar; 42(3):817-58. PubMed ID: 11652588
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Cruzan II: a clear and convincing travesty.
Bopp J; Avila D
Natl Univ Law Rev; 1992 Apr; 1(1):1-47. PubMed ID: 11654704
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Introduction: the right to die after Cruzan.
Hoffmann DE
Md J Contemp Leg Issues; 1991; 2(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 11651214
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Newman v. William Beaumont Army Medical Center.
Nimz M
Issues Law Med; 1987; 3(1):67-70. PubMed ID: 11644089
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Artificial nutrition and the terminally ill: how should Washington decide?
Beatty JA
Wash Law Rev; 1986 Apr; 61(2):419-57. PubMed ID: 11652503
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Constitutional law--can a "life advocate" impair the constitutional right to reject life-prolonging medical treatment?--In re Jobes, 210 N.J.Super. 543, 510 A.2d 133.
Armstrong A
Cumberland Law Rev; 1986-1987; 17(2):553-68. PubMed ID: 11658968
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Live or let die; who decides an incompetent's fate? In re Storar and In re Eichner.
Bates KW
Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1982; 1982(2):387-400. PubMed ID: 11655681
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
