205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11644092)
21. Wishes of patient in refusing care backed in Jersey.
Sullivan JF
N Y Times Web; 1987 Jun; ():A1, B12. PubMed ID: 11647828
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. The Nancy Cruzan case.
McCormick RA
Midwest Med Ethics; 1989; 5(1-2):2-31. PubMed ID: 12091960
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Incompetents and the right to die: in search of consistent meaningful standards.
Strasser M
KY Law J; 1994-1995; 83(4):733-98. PubMed ID: 11654615
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Brophy v. New England Sinai Hospital.
Nimz MM
Issues Law Med; 1986 Nov; 2(3):221-34. PubMed ID: 11644064
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Comatose woman's family presses food-tube removal.
Sullivan R
N Y Times Web; 1986 Mar; ():B2. PubMed ID: 11646499
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Gray v. Romeo.
Di Somma AV
Issues Law Med; 1989; 4(4):535-40. PubMed ID: 11644379
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. "Right to die" cases: a model for judicial decision-making?
Webster WL
N Y Law School Hum Rights Annu; 1990; 7(2):140-56. PubMed ID: 11652592
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Court to rule on right to die in case of brain injury victim.
N Y Times Web; 1989 Jul; ():14. PubMed ID: 11646726
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Cruzan v. Harmon and the dangerous claim that others can exercise an incapacitated patient's right to die.
Ellman IM
Jurimetrics; 1989; 29(4):389-401. PubMed ID: 11652559
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Right-to-die case gets first hearing in Supreme Court.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 1989 Dec; ():A1, B26. PubMed ID: 11646739
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Top Maine court backs right to die.
N Y Times Web; 1987 Dec; ():41. PubMed ID: 11646647
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Death and life decisions: who is in control?
Kenney SC
Loyola Los Angel Law Rev; 1990 Apr; 23(3):791-828. PubMed ID: 11652584
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. The effects of the Cruzan case on the rights of elderly clients.
Gottlich V
Clgh Rev; 1990 Nov; 24(7):663-70. PubMed ID: 11652574
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Decisionmaking in authorizing and withholding life sustaining medical treatment: from Quinlan to Cruzan.
Keilitz I; Bilzor JC; Hafemeister TL; Brown V; Dudyshyn D
Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1989; 13(5):482-93. PubMed ID: 11654759
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The due process "right to life" in Cruzan and its impact on "right-to-die" law.
Bopp J; Avila D
Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1991; 53(1):193-233. PubMed ID: 11652639
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. The right to die in peace: substituted consent and the mentally incompetent.
Brant J
Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1977; 11(4):959-73. PubMed ID: 11664849
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. The encouragment of empathy: just decisionmaking for incompetent terminal patients.
Oxman ML
J Law Health; 1988-1989; 3(2):189-217. PubMed ID: 11652566
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Does right to privacy include right to die? Court to decide.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 1989 Jul; ():A1, A15. PubMed ID: 11647412
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. The role of the family in medical decisionmaking for incompetent adult patients: a historical perspective and case analysis.
Krasik EB
Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1987; 48(2):539-618. PubMed ID: 11658944
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Medical decisionmaking for the incompetent person: a comprehensive approach.
Marzen TJ
Issues Law Med; 1986 Jan; 1(4):293-317. PubMed ID: 11651815
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
