These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11644092)
41. Bioethics in the courts: summaries of selected judicial decisions, 1989 to 1995. Nelson LJ Clin Ethics Rep; 1995; 9(1-2):1-20. PubMed ID: 11653201 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. The Cruzan decision -- a surgeon's perspective. McNoble DJ Memphis State Univ Law Rev; 1990; 20(4):569-610. PubMed ID: 11652628 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Withholding life support treatment in Illinois--Part I. Hodgman DR; Frazer QR Ill Bar J; 1984 Oct; 73(2):106-11. PubMed ID: 11658588 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. In re Storar: euthanasia for incompetent patients, a proposed model. Haber JG Pace Law Rev; 1983; 3(2):351-74. PubMed ID: 11658505 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. In re Conroy: forging a path to death with dignity. Agrawal A Boston Univ Law Rev; 1987 Mar; 67(2):365-89. PubMed ID: 11649960 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. The right to die: an exercise of informed consent, not an extension of the constitutional right to privacy. Lyon EA Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1990; 58(4):1367-95. PubMed ID: 11659504 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. In re Gardner. Thompson LC Issues Law Med; 1988; 4(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 11644474 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Another state joins right-to-die issue. Robbins W N Y Times Web; 1987 Nov; ():A14. PubMed ID: 11646625 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Right-to-die damage actions: developments in the law. Miller DH Denver Univ Law Rev; 1988; 65(2-3):181-212. PubMed ID: 11659201 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. In re Beth Israel Medical Center. Thompson L Issues Law Med; 1988; 4(2):261-6. PubMed ID: 11644333 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Workman's Circle Home and Infirmary for the Aged v. Fink. Kirkpatrick GA Issues Law Med; 1988; 4(3):407-8. PubMed ID: 11644341 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Judicial innovation and policy re-invention: state supreme courts and the right to die. Glick HR West Polit Q; 1992; ():71-92. PubMed ID: 11652627 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Decision on feeding tube sought in test case. Rust M Am Med News; 1985 May; 28(19):1, 33-34. PubMed ID: 11653667 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. A legal test of the right to die. Malcolm AH N Y Times Web; 1985 May; ():9. PubMed ID: 11646513 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. McConnell v. Beverly Enterprises. Di Somma AV Issues Law Med; 1989; 4(4):525-33. PubMed ID: 11644378 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Ombudsman bars food-tube removal. Sullivan R N Y Times Web; 1986 Mar; ():B2. PubMed ID: 11646515 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. In the matter of Mary Hier. Paulus SM Issues Law Med; 1986 Mar; 1(5):413-6. PubMed ID: 11644048 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Withholding food and water from a patient--should it be condoned in California? Harber SM Pac Law J; 1985 Apr; 16(3):877-93. PubMed ID: 11652432 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Man is allowed to let daughter die. Lewin T N Y Times Web; 1993 Jan; ():A12. PubMed ID: 11646966 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Delio v. Westchester County Medical Center. Kirkpatrick GA Issues Law Med; 1987 May; 2(6):491-4. PubMed ID: 11644074 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]